Restitution

The most significant case in the law of restitution in 2009 is probably Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ), Singapore Branch v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2009] 4 SLR(R) 788 (Belinda Ang Saw Ean J), which involved many points in the law of restitution, although the central point...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: YEO, Tiong Min
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1073
https://search.library.smu.edu.sg/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_informit_408547509421314&context=PC&vid=65SMU_INST:SMU_NUI&lang=en&search_scope=Everything&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Singapore%20Academy%20of%20Law%20Annual%20Review%20of%20Cases%202009%20restitution&offset=0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:The most significant case in the law of restitution in 2009 is probably Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ), Singapore Branch v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2009] 4 SLR(R) 788 (Belinda Ang Saw Ean J), which involved many points in the law of restitution, although the central points in the case turned on agency law. In addition, there were a number of decisions on various aspects of the law of restitution, sometimes touching on the subject only incidentally.