Revisiting Authorisation Liability in Copyright Law
In this article, the authors revisit the origins and purpose of the law on authorising infringement and propose that the word “authorise” should bear the dictionary meaning of “sanction, approve, countenance”, in lieu of the phrase “grant or purported grant” as adopted in the CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | SAW, Cheng Lim, CHIK, Warren B. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1150 http://journalsonline.academypublishing.org.sg/Journals/Singapore-Academy-of-Law-Journal-Special-Issue/e-Archive/ctl/eFirstSALPDFJournalView/mid/513/ArticleId/360/Citation/JournalsOnlinePDF |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Where Copyright Law and Technology Once Again Cross Paths: The Continuing Saga: RecordTV Pte Ltd v MediaCorp TV Singapore Pte Ltd [2011] 1 SLR 830
by: SAW, Cheng Lim, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Is There a Defence of Public Interest in the Law of Copyright in Singapore?
by: SAW, Cheng Lim
Published: (2003) -
Opportunity Lost? Revisiting RecordTV v MediaCorp TV
by: CHIK, Warren B., et al.
Published: (2012) -
Protecting the Sound of Silence in 4'33: A Timely Revisit of Basic Principles in Copyright Law
by: SAW, Cheng Lim
Published: (2005) -
Parallel Imports and the Law of Copyright in Singapore
by: WEI, George S. S.
Published: (1992)