Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War
This paper analyses the critical influences on witness-based truth-telling for judicial decision-making in the international criminal tribunals. The judicial fixation on witness testimony reflects the weight and legitimacy given to personal testimony before international courts. This weight must be...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1166 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3118/viewcontent/ShamMoralCourt.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3118 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-31182017-03-22T01:15:01Z Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War FINDLAY, Mark Ngane, Sylvia This paper analyses the critical influences on witness-based truth-telling for judicial decision-making in the international criminal tribunals. The judicial fixation on witness testimony reflects the weight and legitimacy given to personal testimony before international courts. This weight must be balanced by the awareness that a witness may provide false testimony intentionally, or may be coaxed by third parties to provide such testimony, as has been evidenced recently before the ICC. If witness testimony is tainted then its capacity to endorse the truth-finding function of the court is compromised. As a consequence the ability to assert that the tribunal is a ‘moral court’ based on empirical truth in such circumstances is jeopardized. The nexus between witness testimony, truth, the morality of judicial determinations, and the legitimacy this affords is explored in what follows. We question whether simple assertions that witness testimony, tested through adversarial examination, produces truth and resultant morality, are all they seem. The analysis also critiques the forensic reality of witness testimony before the international tribunals. Ultimately the paper suggests that while truthful testimony is crucial if international criminal trials are to produce legitimate judicial determinations, the naïve claim to a moral court as a consequence of tested witness testimony is problematic at least and unsustainable at best. 2012-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1166 info:doi/10.1163/2211906X-00101003 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3118/viewcontent/ShamMoralCourt.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University International Criminal Court truth legitimacy witness testimony judicial discretion selective prosecution moral court Comparative and Foreign Law Criminal Law Human Rights Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
International Criminal Court truth legitimacy witness testimony judicial discretion selective prosecution moral court Comparative and Foreign Law Criminal Law Human Rights Law |
spellingShingle |
International Criminal Court truth legitimacy witness testimony judicial discretion selective prosecution moral court Comparative and Foreign Law Criminal Law Human Rights Law FINDLAY, Mark Ngane, Sylvia Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War |
description |
This paper analyses the critical influences on witness-based truth-telling for judicial decision-making in the international criminal tribunals. The judicial fixation on witness testimony reflects the weight and legitimacy given to personal testimony before international courts. This weight must be balanced by the awareness that a witness may provide false testimony intentionally, or may be coaxed by third parties to provide such testimony, as has been evidenced recently before the ICC. If witness testimony is tainted then its capacity to endorse the truth-finding function of the court is compromised. As a consequence the ability to assert that the tribunal is a ‘moral court’ based on empirical truth in such circumstances is jeopardized. The nexus between witness testimony, truth, the morality of judicial determinations, and the legitimacy this affords is explored in what follows. We question whether simple assertions that witness testimony, tested through adversarial examination, produces truth and resultant morality, are all they seem. The analysis also critiques the forensic reality of witness testimony before the international tribunals. Ultimately the paper suggests that while truthful testimony is crucial if international criminal trials are to produce legitimate judicial determinations, the naïve claim to a moral court as a consequence of tested witness testimony is problematic at least and unsustainable at best. |
format |
text |
author |
FINDLAY, Mark Ngane, Sylvia |
author_facet |
FINDLAY, Mark Ngane, Sylvia |
author_sort |
FINDLAY, Mark |
title |
Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War |
title_short |
Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War |
title_full |
Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War |
title_fullStr |
Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sham of the Moral Court? Testimony sold as the Spoils of War |
title_sort |
sham of the moral court? testimony sold as the spoils of war |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1166 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3118/viewcontent/ShamMoralCourt.pdf |
_version_ |
1772829308936519680 |