An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment

The principle that no one shall be unjustly enriched at the expense of another has been invoked to rationalise the right to restitution in a number of cases which fall outside the provinces of contract and tort. This has eventually led to the recognition of an independent legal discipline known as t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: SEE, Alvin W. L.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1228
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3180/viewcontent/An_Introduction_to_the_Law_of_Unjust_Enrichment.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3180
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-31802018-06-14T06:34:05Z An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment SEE, Alvin W. L. The principle that no one shall be unjustly enriched at the expense of another has been invoked to rationalise the right to restitution in a number of cases which fall outside the provinces of contract and tort. This has eventually led to the recognition of an independent legal discipline known as the law of unjust enrichment. It is among the most debated private law subjects today despite its remarkably recent origin. In Malaysia, despite the increase in judicial reference to the language of unjust enrichment to justify an award of restitutionary relief, there is generally a lack of understanding about the subject and a failure to adopt a principled approach in its treatment. Therefore, it can hardly be said that Malaysia has a well-developed law of unjust enrichment, which is unfortunate given how frequently issues concerning unjust enrichment arise. This article seeks to address the problem by offering an introduction to the subject. The ensuing discussion proceeds in five parts. Part I (History) embarks on a journey through time, tracing the evolution of unjust enrichment from its beginning to its modern form. Part II (Taxonomy) examines the place of unjust enrichment within the general framework of private law and explains its differences with the more familiar disciplines such as contract and tort. Part III (Terminology), which flows from the discussions in Parts II and I, explains why it is important to speak of unjust enrichment instead of restitution. Part IV (Lessons) explains why the discussions in Parts I to III matter today. Lastly, Part V (Future) sets out certain themes that should inform future works on this subject. The last two parts will focus on the Malaysian context. 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1228 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3180/viewcontent/An_Introduction_to_the_Law_of_Unjust_Enrichment.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Unjust Enrichment Restitution Conflict of Laws Contracts
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Unjust Enrichment
Restitution
Conflict of Laws
Contracts
spellingShingle Unjust Enrichment
Restitution
Conflict of Laws
Contracts
SEE, Alvin W. L.
An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment
description The principle that no one shall be unjustly enriched at the expense of another has been invoked to rationalise the right to restitution in a number of cases which fall outside the provinces of contract and tort. This has eventually led to the recognition of an independent legal discipline known as the law of unjust enrichment. It is among the most debated private law subjects today despite its remarkably recent origin. In Malaysia, despite the increase in judicial reference to the language of unjust enrichment to justify an award of restitutionary relief, there is generally a lack of understanding about the subject and a failure to adopt a principled approach in its treatment. Therefore, it can hardly be said that Malaysia has a well-developed law of unjust enrichment, which is unfortunate given how frequently issues concerning unjust enrichment arise. This article seeks to address the problem by offering an introduction to the subject. The ensuing discussion proceeds in five parts. Part I (History) embarks on a journey through time, tracing the evolution of unjust enrichment from its beginning to its modern form. Part II (Taxonomy) examines the place of unjust enrichment within the general framework of private law and explains its differences with the more familiar disciplines such as contract and tort. Part III (Terminology), which flows from the discussions in Parts II and I, explains why it is important to speak of unjust enrichment instead of restitution. Part IV (Lessons) explains why the discussions in Parts I to III matter today. Lastly, Part V (Future) sets out certain themes that should inform future works on this subject. The last two parts will focus on the Malaysian context.
format text
author SEE, Alvin W. L.
author_facet SEE, Alvin W. L.
author_sort SEE, Alvin W. L.
title An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment
title_short An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment
title_full An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment
title_fullStr An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment
title_full_unstemmed An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment
title_sort introduction to the law of unjust enrichment
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2013
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1228
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3180/viewcontent/An_Introduction_to_the_Law_of_Unjust_Enrichment.pdf
_version_ 1772829309155672064