The Future of the Similar Fact Rule in an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction: Singapore
In yet another attempt to bridge the gap between the rules of an antiquated statute and the modern realities of practice, Singapore’s Evidence Act was amended in 2012. Certain relevancy provisions were amended to allow greater admissibility of evidence. While new provisions were introduced to act as...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1255 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3207/viewcontent/futureofSFRinsg_NUJSedited_v2.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Stephen’s prudent person and the standard of proof in Indian Evidence Act Jurisdictions
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2023) -
Revisiting the Similar Fact Rule in Singapore: Public Prosecutor v. Mas Swan bin Adnan and another
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2011) -
Re-aligning legal professional privilege in Indian Evidence Act jurisdictions with modern practice
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Redefining Relevancy and Exclusionary Discretion in Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872: The Singapore Experiment and Lessons for Other Indian Evidence Act Jurisdictions
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2014) -
The Judicial Discretion to Exclude Relevant Evidence: Perspectives from an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2012)