Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872: On the Verge of Abolition in Singapore?
Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872 was a revolutionary piece of work with respect to its conceptualisation of relevance and admissibility – essentially, it simplified the common law framework and statutorily defined what was relevant and admissible and obviated the need to ask...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1277 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Redefining Relevancy and Exclusionary Discretion in Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872: The Singapore Experiment and Lessons for Other Indian Evidence Act Jurisdictions
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2014) -
The Indian Evidence Act and recent formulations of the exclusionary discretion in Singapore: Not quite different rivers into the same sea
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Minorities of the minorities: A comparative study on the indigenous peoples provisions in House Bill 4994: Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) and Republic Act 8371: The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA)
by: Andres, Ana Victoria I., et al.
Published: (2015) -
The Judicial Discretion to Exclude Relevant Evidence: Perspectives from an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2012) -
The Future of the Similar Fact Rule in an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction: Singapore
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013)