Misrepresentation, Fiduciary Duty and Negligence: Investor Scores Rare Win in Deutsche Bank v Chang
Law reports of the last decade are littered with unsuccessful suits by investors against their banks for negligent or unsuitable advice. Rarely do investors succeed. This is despite the wide array of courses of action available, allowing them to sue for breaches by the bank of contractual duty (in p...
Saved in:
Main Author: | LOW, Kee Yang |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1345 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3297/viewcontent/MisrepresentationFiduciaryDuty_2013_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Deutsche Bank v Chang: A Dramatic Reversal by the Court of Appeal
by: LOW, Kee Yang
Published: (2014) -
Fiduciary duties: The case of prescription
by: LOW, Kelvin F. K.
Published: (2016) -
Freezing Injunctions: Bank's Duty of Care in Negligence
by: CHAN, Gary Kok Yew
Published: (2006) -
Choice of Law for Fiduciary Duties
by: YEO, Tiong Min
Published: (1999) -
Peering Through Equity's Prism: A Fiduciary's Duty of Care or a Fiduciary Duty of Care?
by: Tan, Weiming
Published: (2021)