Compromising on Consideration in Singapore: Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter
It is not often that a judgment contains a reference to Aristotle’s work or a coda at its conclusion. The recent Singapore Court of Appeal judgment of Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter (delivered by Andrew Phang JA) contained both, the latter of which an extensive judicial exposition on the d...
Saved in:
Main Author: | GOH, Yihan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1352 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3304/viewcontent/gyh_CompromisingConsiderationSingapore_2009.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Compromise and Coercion: The Cenk Kaptanoglu
by: LEE, Pey Woan
Published: (2012) -
A renewed consideration of consideration: MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd [2016] EWCA CIV 553
by: CHNG, Kenny, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Default Standards for Non-absolute Obligation Clauses: KS Energy v BR Energy Electricity Generation v Woodside Energy
by: YIP, Man, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Breach of Trust edited by Peter Birks and Arianna Pretto 2002 [Book review]
by: YEO, Tiong Min
Published: (2003) -
Lost But Found Again: The Traditional Tests for Implied Terms in Fact: Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd
by: GOH, Yihan
Published: (2016)