Default Standards for Non-absolute Obligation Clauses: KS Energy v BR Energy Electricity Generation v Woodside Energy
A “reasonable endeavours” undertaking, and its variants, are common features of commercial contracts. These clauses might be inserted into agreements to balance the interests of the parties where the achievement of the contractual object involves conditions beyond the obligor’s control, for example,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | YIP, Man, GOH, Yihan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1383 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3335/viewcontent/DEFAULT_STANDARDS_FOR_NON_ABSOLUTE_OBLIGATION_CLAUSE_LMCLQ_pv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The "Party Scope" of exclusive jurisdiction clauses: Global Partners Fund Ltd v Babcock & Brown Ltd
by: CHONG, Adeline
Published: (2011) -
Marley v Rawlings: Reflections from Singapore
by: YIP, Man, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Exemption clauses
by: SHENOY, George T. L.
Published: (2013) -
Is a Contractual Clause Excluding a Right of Set-Off Subject to the Requirement of Reasonableness in the Unfair Contract Terms Act?
by: GOH, Yihan
Published: (2015) -
Default clauses in debt contracts
by: LI, Ningzhong, et al.
Published: (2015)