Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd

This piece discusses the following aspects of contractual interpretation in Singapore raised in the recent Singapore High Court case of Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd [2011] 4 SLR 1094: (a) the distinction between interpretation and implication of terms in fact; (b) the occasions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: GOH, Yihan
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1404
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3356
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-33562015-04-14T06:00:06Z Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd GOH, Yihan This piece discusses the following aspects of contractual interpretation in Singapore raised in the recent Singapore High Court case of Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd [2011] 4 SLR 1094: (a) the distinction between interpretation and implication of terms in fact; (b) the occasions in which extrinsic evidence is admissible for the interpretation of contracts in Singapore; and (c) the distinction between “admissible extrinsic evidence” and “permissible interpretation”. 2012-03-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1404 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Commercial Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Asian Studies
Commercial Law
spellingShingle Asian Studies
Commercial Law
GOH, Yihan
Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd
description This piece discusses the following aspects of contractual interpretation in Singapore raised in the recent Singapore High Court case of Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd [2011] 4 SLR 1094: (a) the distinction between interpretation and implication of terms in fact; (b) the occasions in which extrinsic evidence is admissible for the interpretation of contracts in Singapore; and (c) the distinction between “admissible extrinsic evidence” and “permissible interpretation”.
format text
author GOH, Yihan
author_facet GOH, Yihan
author_sort GOH, Yihan
title Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd
title_short Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd
title_full Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd
title_fullStr Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd
title_full_unstemmed Contractual Interpretation in Singapore: Continued Refinement after Zurich Insurance: Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd v Carilla Pte Ltd
title_sort contractual interpretation in singapore: continued refinement after zurich insurance: sheng siong supermarket pte ltd v carilla pte ltd
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2012
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1404
_version_ 1772829600180600832