Occupier's Liability after See Toh: Change, Uncertainty and Complexity
With the recent Court of Appeal decision in See Toh (C.A.), the Singapore law on occupiers' liability has undergone a sea change. There are two obvious changes. The first is that there is no longer a distinction between invitees and licensees; the law accords them the same protection. The secon...
Saved in:
Main Author: | LOW, Kee Yang |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1411 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Equitable Relief for Breach of Contract: Wisanggeni Lauw v Full Fledge Holdings Ltd [2005] SGCA 21
by: THAM, Chee Ho
Published: (2006) -
Vicarious Liability: The Close Connection Test and the Skandinaviska Decision
by: LOW, Kee Yang
Published: (2012) -
Private liability for public health
by: SOH, Jerrold
Published: (2020) -
Marley v Rawlings: Reflections from Singapore
by: YIP, Man, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Taking stock of the change of position defence
by: TANG, Hang Wu
Published: (2015)