Discharge of a Contract where Both Parties are in Breach: Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Comfort Resources Pte Ltd

This case note examines the most recent attempt by the Court of Appeal to provide further guidance on: (a) how the doctrine of discharge of contract by breach operates when both parties are in breach of their contract obligations; and (b) when a promisee is entitled to rely on an alternate basis to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: THAM, Chee Ho
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1554
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3506/viewcontent/P_ID_51407__2010_22SAcLJ_729_741_Tham.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3506
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-35062016-03-10T03:48:06Z Discharge of a Contract where Both Parties are in Breach: Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Comfort Resources Pte Ltd THAM, Chee Ho This case note examines the most recent attempt by the Court of Appeal to provide further guidance on: (a) how the doctrine of discharge of contract by breach operates when both parties are in breach of their contract obligations; and (b) when a promisee is entitled to rely on an alternate basis to justify its election to discharge a contract for the promisor’s breach when the basis originally relied upon and communicated to the promisor is ultimately found to be legally insufficient. 2010-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1554 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3506/viewcontent/P_ID_51407__2010_22SAcLJ_729_741_Tham.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Commercial Law Contracts
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Asian Studies
Commercial Law
Contracts
spellingShingle Asian Studies
Commercial Law
Contracts
THAM, Chee Ho
Discharge of a Contract where Both Parties are in Breach: Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Comfort Resources Pte Ltd
description This case note examines the most recent attempt by the Court of Appeal to provide further guidance on: (a) how the doctrine of discharge of contract by breach operates when both parties are in breach of their contract obligations; and (b) when a promisee is entitled to rely on an alternate basis to justify its election to discharge a contract for the promisor’s breach when the basis originally relied upon and communicated to the promisor is ultimately found to be legally insufficient.
format text
author THAM, Chee Ho
author_facet THAM, Chee Ho
author_sort THAM, Chee Ho
title Discharge of a Contract where Both Parties are in Breach: Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Comfort Resources Pte Ltd
title_short Discharge of a Contract where Both Parties are in Breach: Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Comfort Resources Pte Ltd
title_full Discharge of a Contract where Both Parties are in Breach: Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Comfort Resources Pte Ltd
title_fullStr Discharge of a Contract where Both Parties are in Breach: Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Comfort Resources Pte Ltd
title_full_unstemmed Discharge of a Contract where Both Parties are in Breach: Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd v Comfort Resources Pte Ltd
title_sort discharge of a contract where both parties are in breach: alliance concrete singapore pte ltd v comfort resources pte ltd
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2010
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1554
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3506/viewcontent/P_ID_51407__2010_22SAcLJ_729_741_Tham.pdf
_version_ 1772829591245684736