Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?

This paper examines the origin of the distinction between facilitative and evaluative mediation, and the subsequent debate concerning the use of evaluative mediation. The paper questions the apparent dichotomy between the two styles of mediation, and suggests that the common meaning attributed to th...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
Format:	text
Language:	English
Published:	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2013
Subjects:	Alternative Dispute Resolution Dispute Resolution Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Online Access:	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1750
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution:	Singapore Management University
Language:	English

id	sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3702
record_format	dspace
spelling	sg-smu-ink.sol_research-37022016-10-10T10:06:01Z Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy? QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas This paper examines the origin of the distinction between facilitative and evaluative mediation, and the subsequent debate concerning the use of evaluative mediation. The paper questions the apparent dichotomy between the two styles of mediation, and suggests that the common meaning attributed to these terms may have detracted mediators from a meaningful consideration of mediation styles and techniques. The author also offers her own perspective on how to navigate this "dichotomy". 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1750 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Alternative Dispute Resolution Dispute Resolution Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
institution	Singapore Management University
building	SMU Libraries
continent	Asia
country	Singapore Singapore
content_provider	SMU Libraries
collection	InK@SMU
language	English
topic	Alternative Dispute Resolution Dispute Resolution Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
spellingShingle	Alternative Dispute Resolution Dispute Resolution Dispute Resolution and Arbitration QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?
description	This paper examines the origin of the distinction between facilitative and evaluative mediation, and the subsequent debate concerning the use of evaluative mediation. The paper questions the apparent dichotomy between the two styles of mediation, and suggests that the common meaning attributed to these terms may have detracted mediators from a meaningful consideration of mediation styles and techniques. The author also offers her own perspective on how to navigate this "dichotomy".
format	text
author	QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
author_facet	QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
author_sort	QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
title	Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?
title_short	Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?
title_full	Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?
title_fullStr	Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?
title_full_unstemmed	Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?
title_sort	facilitative versus evaluative mediation: is there necessarily a dichotomy?
publisher	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate	2013
url	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1750
_version_	1772829253179539456

Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?

Similar Items