UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 2
This is the second of four in a series of blog posts on Kluwer Mediation Blog. They were published in conjunction with the the 65th session of the UNCITRAL Working Group II on arbitration and conciliation. The Working Group has turned its attention to the settlement of commercial disputes and in par...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas, ALEXANDER, Nadja, HOWARD, Anna |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1760 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3712/viewcontent/UNCITRALandthe_enforceability_of_iMSAs_part_2.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 3
by: QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas, et al.
Published: (2016) -
UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 4
by: HOWARD, Anna, et al.
Published: (2016) -
UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: The debate heats up
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Supporting party autonomy in the enforcement of cross-border mediated settlement agreements: A brave new world or unchartered territory?
by: QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
Published: (2019) -
An implied ground for refusal to enforce iMSAs under the Singapore convention on mediation: The effect of Article 6
by: CHONG, Shouyu, et al.
Published: (2019)