Content review and copyright protection in China after the 2009 U.S. v. China WTO panel ruling
China has always maintained relatively-strict content censorship and has prohibited works with illicit or immoral content (offending works) from publication and dissemination. This article examines and compares UK, U.S., and German practices, and whether such works are copyright-able, and if so, to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | ZHANG, Weijun, LI, Yanbing |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1772 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
China’s rise: How it took on the U.S. at the WTO
by: SHAFFER, Greg, et al.
Published: (2018) -
China’s rise: How it took on the U.S. at the WTO
by: SHAFFER, Greg, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Corporate strategies, first sale rules, and copyright misuse: Waiting for answers from Kirstsaeng v. Wiley and Omega v. Costco (II)
by: CALBOLI, Irene
Published: (2013) -
The case for a legislative amendment against accessory copyright for grey market products: What can the U.S. learn from Singapore and Australia
by: CALBOLI, Irene, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Overlapping copyright and trademark protection: A call for concern and action
by: CALBOLI, Irene
Published: (2014)