The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-examining the Declaration of Falsity

This article re-examines the following objections to a declaration of falsity in respect of a defamation claim at common law: that there is no legal right to a good reputation, the granting of such a relief would subvert the balance under the defence of qualified privilege, the concern with the open...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHAN, Gary Kok Yew
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1819
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3771
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-37712017-03-01T10:15:51Z The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-examining the Declaration of Falsity CHAN, Gary Kok Yew This article re-examines the following objections to a declaration of falsity in respect of a defamation claim at common law: that there is no legal right to a good reputation, the granting of such a relief would subvert the balance under the defence of qualified privilege, the concern with the opening of floodgates, that judicial discretion should be exercised against granting such a declaration in the absence of full evidence and argument as to the truth or falsity of the imputations, and where there is an award of damages, it would already provide vindication to the plaintiff. It also makes a case for declaration of falsity as an alternative remedy in limited circumstances. 2016-12-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1819 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Tort Defamation Remedies Torts
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Tort
Defamation
Remedies
Torts
spellingShingle Tort
Defamation
Remedies
Torts
CHAN, Gary Kok Yew
The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-examining the Declaration of Falsity
description This article re-examines the following objections to a declaration of falsity in respect of a defamation claim at common law: that there is no legal right to a good reputation, the granting of such a relief would subvert the balance under the defence of qualified privilege, the concern with the opening of floodgates, that judicial discretion should be exercised against granting such a declaration in the absence of full evidence and argument as to the truth or falsity of the imputations, and where there is an award of damages, it would already provide vindication to the plaintiff. It also makes a case for declaration of falsity as an alternative remedy in limited circumstances.
format text
author CHAN, Gary Kok Yew
author_facet CHAN, Gary Kok Yew
author_sort CHAN, Gary Kok Yew
title The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-examining the Declaration of Falsity
title_short The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-examining the Declaration of Falsity
title_full The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-examining the Declaration of Falsity
title_fullStr The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-examining the Declaration of Falsity
title_full_unstemmed The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-examining the Declaration of Falsity
title_sort right to a good (business) reputation and truth: re-examining the declaration of falsity
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2016
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1819
_version_ 1772829351025311744