Nudging users towards cross-border mediation: Is it really about harmonised enforcement regulation?
In this paper the author challenges her audience to think in different ways about creating the shift needed to make cross-border mediation practice a reality rather than rhetoric. Within Asia, Hong Kong, Singapore and other centres are positioning themselves as regional leaders in cross-border media...
Saved in:
Main Author: | ALEXANDER, Nadja |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1854 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3806/viewcontent/NudgingUsersCrossBorderMediation_2014_CAAJ_pv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 4
by: HOWARD, Anna, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Singapore Case Note: Enforceability of settlement agreements
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Supporting party autonomy in the enforcement of cross-border mediated settlement agreements: A brave new world or unchartered territory?
by: QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas
Published: (2019) -
A matter of interpretation? Understanding and applying mediation standards for the cross-border enforcement of mediated settlement agreements
by: Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON,
Published: (2020) -
UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 3
by: QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas, et al.
Published: (2016)