The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers
If a company incurs substantial fines or other pecuniary losses as a result of its unlawful conduct, can the company obtain an indemnity from its director/officer for having caused the company to incur such fines and losses? In particular, can the director/officer utilise the defence of illegality,...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1921 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3873/viewcontent/the_illegality_defence_in_corporate_law_claims_against_directors_and_officers__1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3873 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-38732017-04-10T06:50:22Z The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers WAN, Wai Yee If a company incurs substantial fines or other pecuniary losses as a result of its unlawful conduct, can the company obtain an indemnity from its director/officer for having caused the company to incur such fines and losses? In particular, can the director/officer utilise the defence of illegality, notwithstanding that he has breached his duties owed to the company? The illegality defence, which raises the twin issues of the relationship between the unlawful act to the corporate claim and the attribution of the unlawful act to the company, has been the subject of detailed analysis recently in England, Singapore and Hong Kong. This article argues that absent clear legislative intention, there is no reason for English law to bar the claims against the delinquent director/officer, once regard is made to the relevant constituencies of the company. In particular, there is no reason for the illegality defence to operate if the result will prejudice the non-complicit constituencies of the company, such as the creditors where company is insolvent or where the company has innocent participants. Likewise, it argues that in determining the proper scope of the attribution of the acts or knowledge of the delinquent director/officer to the company, regard should also be made to the relevant constituencies of the company. If the result is one that does not lead to the delinquent director/officer benefitting from the corporate claim, there is no reason to attribute the wrongdoing so as to bar the corporate claim. 2016-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1921 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3873/viewcontent/the_illegality_defence_in_corporate_law_claims_against_directors_and_officers__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Corporate illegality directors' duties Asian Studies Commercial Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Corporate illegality directors' duties Asian Studies Commercial Law |
spellingShingle |
Corporate illegality directors' duties Asian Studies Commercial Law WAN, Wai Yee The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers |
description |
If a company incurs substantial fines or other pecuniary losses as a result of its unlawful conduct, can the company obtain an indemnity from its director/officer for having caused the company to incur such fines and losses? In particular, can the director/officer utilise the defence of illegality, notwithstanding that he has breached his duties owed to the company? The illegality defence, which raises the twin issues of the relationship between the unlawful act to the corporate claim and the attribution of the unlawful act to the company, has been the subject of detailed analysis recently in England, Singapore and Hong Kong. This article argues that absent clear legislative intention, there is no reason for English law to bar the claims against the delinquent director/officer, once regard is made to the relevant constituencies of the company. In particular, there is no reason for the illegality defence to operate if the result will prejudice the non-complicit constituencies of the company, such as the creditors where company is insolvent or where the company has innocent participants. Likewise, it argues that in determining the proper scope of the attribution of the acts or knowledge of the delinquent director/officer to the company, regard should also be made to the relevant constituencies of the company. If the result is one that does not lead to the delinquent director/officer benefitting from the corporate claim, there is no reason to attribute the wrongdoing so as to bar the corporate claim. |
format |
text |
author |
WAN, Wai Yee |
author_facet |
WAN, Wai Yee |
author_sort |
WAN, Wai Yee |
title |
The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers |
title_short |
The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers |
title_full |
The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers |
title_fullStr |
The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers |
title_full_unstemmed |
The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers |
title_sort |
illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1921 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3873/viewcontent/the_illegality_defence_in_corporate_law_claims_against_directors_and_officers__1_.pdf |
_version_ |
1772829720039129088 |