The Final Twist in Common Intention? Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v. Public Prosecutor
It was only in 2008 that the Court of Appeal made a seminal restatement of the law on common intention, particularly with respect to liability in so-called ‘twin crime’ situations. The question posed then was posed again recently in Daniel Vijay: what exactly is the required mens rea for the seconda...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHEN, Siyuan |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1975 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3927/viewcontent/FinalTwistCommonIntention_2011_SJLS.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
by: CHUA, Eunice
Published: (2011) -
Impossible attempts and the punishment of intent: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor
by: CHAN, Wing Cheong
Published: (2020) -
Possession and Knowledge in the Misuse of Drugs Act: Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v. Public Prosecutor
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Opening the door to fickle-minded guilty pleas? Public Prosecutor v Dinesh s/o Rajantheran
by: GOH, Teng Jun Gerome
Published: (2020) -
Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37
by: CHAN, Wing Cheong
Published: (2023)