The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm of Society?

The claim that the jury is a randomly chosen and representative sample of community is an important part of the ideology which currently underpins the institution. Supporters of the jury argue that both its impartiality and its independence from the State are bolstered by the fact that it represents...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DUFF, Peter, FINDLAY, Mark, HOWARTH, Carla
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1998
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3950/viewcontent/HongKongJury_1990.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3950
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-39502024-06-21T02:00:11Z The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm of Society? DUFF, Peter FINDLAY, Mark HOWARTH, Carla The claim that the jury is a randomly chosen and representative sample of community is an important part of the ideology which currently underpins the institution. Supporters of the jury argue that both its impartiality and its independence from the State are bolstered by the fact that it represents a randomly selected cross-section of the populace. In most common law jurisdictions where the jury operates, various steps have been taken over recent years in order preserve and strengthen the perception of the jury as a "microcosm of democratic society". For example, in England the property qualification for jurors was removed in 1972 and, consequently, the franchise became virtually universal. Similar moves have recently taken place in various Australian jurisdictions.Against this background of increasingly representative juries elsewhere, the Hong Kong jury is an oddity. Like most of the legal institutions and laws of Hong Kong, it was imported to the colony from England, the colonising power. Indeed, the English law concerning juries and jurors still applies to Hong Kong in so far as it does not conflict with the special provisions made for the jurisdiction by the Jury Ordinance. Yet the Hong Kong jury is not in the least representative of the Hong Kong community, nor has there been any attempt to make it so. The major purpose of this article, therefore, is to discuss the unusual composition of the Hong Kong jury. First, however, it is useful to outline briefly the development of some of the more important and unique aspects of the way in which the Hong Kong jury operates. 1990-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1998 info:doi/10.1093/iclqaj/39.4.881 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3950/viewcontent/HongKongJury_1990.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Juries Jurors Ordinances Trials Verdicts Defendants Government issued identification Jurisdiction Criminal justice Criminals Hong Kong Asian Studies Criminal Procedure Jurisdiction
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Juries
Jurors
Ordinances
Trials
Verdicts
Defendants
Government issued identification
Jurisdiction
Criminal justice
Criminals
Hong Kong
Asian Studies
Criminal Procedure
Jurisdiction
spellingShingle Juries
Jurors
Ordinances
Trials
Verdicts
Defendants
Government issued identification
Jurisdiction
Criminal justice
Criminals
Hong Kong
Asian Studies
Criminal Procedure
Jurisdiction
DUFF, Peter
FINDLAY, Mark
HOWARTH, Carla
The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm of Society?
description The claim that the jury is a randomly chosen and representative sample of community is an important part of the ideology which currently underpins the institution. Supporters of the jury argue that both its impartiality and its independence from the State are bolstered by the fact that it represents a randomly selected cross-section of the populace. In most common law jurisdictions where the jury operates, various steps have been taken over recent years in order preserve and strengthen the perception of the jury as a "microcosm of democratic society". For example, in England the property qualification for jurors was removed in 1972 and, consequently, the franchise became virtually universal. Similar moves have recently taken place in various Australian jurisdictions.Against this background of increasingly representative juries elsewhere, the Hong Kong jury is an oddity. Like most of the legal institutions and laws of Hong Kong, it was imported to the colony from England, the colonising power. Indeed, the English law concerning juries and jurors still applies to Hong Kong in so far as it does not conflict with the special provisions made for the jurisdiction by the Jury Ordinance. Yet the Hong Kong jury is not in the least representative of the Hong Kong community, nor has there been any attempt to make it so. The major purpose of this article, therefore, is to discuss the unusual composition of the Hong Kong jury. First, however, it is useful to outline briefly the development of some of the more important and unique aspects of the way in which the Hong Kong jury operates.
format text
author DUFF, Peter
FINDLAY, Mark
HOWARTH, Carla
author_facet DUFF, Peter
FINDLAY, Mark
HOWARTH, Carla
author_sort DUFF, Peter
title The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm of Society?
title_short The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm of Society?
title_full The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm of Society?
title_fullStr The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm of Society?
title_full_unstemmed The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm of Society?
title_sort hong kong jury: a microcosm of society?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 1990
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1998
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3950/viewcontent/HongKongJury_1990.pdf
_version_ 1814047639140827136