The Law of Assembly in the People's Republic of China: Implications of the Retreat to Formal Legalism for the Legislative Process in China

Under the most current constitution, written in 1982, the citizens of the PRC are guaranteed freedom of the press, speech, assembly, association, procession, and demonstration; furthermore, all citizens enjoy the rights and assume the responsibilities prescribed by the constitution and the law. In 1...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: FINDLAY, Mark, CHIU, Thomas Chor-Wing
格式: text
語言:English
出版: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1991
主題:
在線閱讀:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2000
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3952/viewcontent/LawAssemblyPRC_1991_JLSocy.pdf
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Singapore Management University
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:Under the most current constitution, written in 1982, the citizens of the PRC are guaranteed freedom of the press, speech, assembly, association, procession, and demonstration; furthermore, all citizens enjoy the rights and assume the responsibilities prescribed by the constitution and the law. In 1989, following the student democracy demonstrations in the PRC, the government circulated a draft of the law concerning assemblies, processions, and demonstrations for public comment. While the 24 articles of the draft legislation effectively removed the right to free public protest by interposing a variety of administrative procedures governing proscription of venue, application, approval, and review, the eventual law did make some attempt to "democratize" the process. Even so, the public security organs now have absolute power to cancel protest activities and arrest any participants or organizers and the category of areas designated as "off limits" to public assemblies has been expanded. The way in which the legislation was passed, its constitutional language, and the ascription to regulation for the protection of citizens' rights reveal the utility of legality in ensuring political legitimacy and highlight the manipulation of the legislative process in the PRC by the government as motivated by foreign policy concerns.