The Impact of Criminal Justice Administration on the Penal Sanction

One of the central philosophies underlying the Report of the Royal Commission into NSW Prisons is revealed in the widely quoted aphorism, "A person is sent to prison as punishment, not for punishment". The conditions under which prisoners are contained feature crucially in assessing both t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: FINDLAY, Mark
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2002
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3954/viewcontent/ImpactCriminalJusticeAdministrationPenal_Sanction_1992_CICJ.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3954
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-39542017-05-22T08:18:37Z The Impact of Criminal Justice Administration on the Penal Sanction FINDLAY, Mark One of the central philosophies underlying the Report of the Royal Commission into NSW Prisons is revealed in the widely quoted aphorism, "A person is sent to prison as punishment, not for punishment". The conditions under which prisoners are contained feature crucially in assessing both the perceptions and reality of prison as a punishment. Expectations for the experience of imprisonment vary enormously. These expectations in many particular forms have been used to justify the expansion and diversification of the penal sanction. In their most modest representation, however, it is hoped that "by treating all prisoners humanely in a manner befitting their human dignity ... prisoners will at least leave prison no worse than when they entered it". 1992-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2002 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3954/viewcontent/ImpactCriminalJusticeAdministrationPenal_Sanction_1992_CICJ.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Criminal Law Criminal Procedure
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
spellingShingle Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
FINDLAY, Mark
The Impact of Criminal Justice Administration on the Penal Sanction
description One of the central philosophies underlying the Report of the Royal Commission into NSW Prisons is revealed in the widely quoted aphorism, "A person is sent to prison as punishment, not for punishment". The conditions under which prisoners are contained feature crucially in assessing both the perceptions and reality of prison as a punishment. Expectations for the experience of imprisonment vary enormously. These expectations in many particular forms have been used to justify the expansion and diversification of the penal sanction. In their most modest representation, however, it is hoped that "by treating all prisoners humanely in a manner befitting their human dignity ... prisoners will at least leave prison no worse than when they entered it".
format text
author FINDLAY, Mark
author_facet FINDLAY, Mark
author_sort FINDLAY, Mark
title The Impact of Criminal Justice Administration on the Penal Sanction
title_short The Impact of Criminal Justice Administration on the Penal Sanction
title_full The Impact of Criminal Justice Administration on the Penal Sanction
title_fullStr The Impact of Criminal Justice Administration on the Penal Sanction
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Criminal Justice Administration on the Penal Sanction
title_sort impact of criminal justice administration on the penal sanction
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 1992
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2002
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3954/viewcontent/ImpactCriminalJusticeAdministrationPenal_Sanction_1992_CICJ.pdf
_version_ 1772829412579868672