Juror Comprehension and the Hard Case: Making Forensic Evidence Simpler

The complexity/comprehension nexus as it impacts on juror decision-making is addressed in the particular context of prosecution-led DNA evidence. Such evidence is for jurors the subject of pre-trial preconceptions, and is notoriously difficult to present and argue before a jury. The article looks at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: FINDLAY, Mark
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2044
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3996/viewcontent/JurorComprehensionHardCase_2008_Findlay_afv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-3996
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-39962017-05-22T07:56:00Z Juror Comprehension and the Hard Case: Making Forensic Evidence Simpler FINDLAY, Mark The complexity/comprehension nexus as it impacts on juror decision-making is addressed in the particular context of prosecution-led DNA evidence. Such evidence is for jurors the subject of pre-trial preconceptions, and is notoriously difficult to present and argue before a jury. The article looks at the comprehension of forensic evidence by jurors, a task qualified by the opinion of legal professionals whose responsibility it is to present and interpret such evidence in adversarial contexts.Jurors were surveyed post-verdict in trials where forensic evidence featured in circumstantial cases. These insights into comprehension were qualified by contesting views of legal professionals, and critical reflections from independent observation teams regarding the manner in which this evidence was used and its intended impact on the jury. What results is both declared and implicit indicators of comprehension, not so much against broad measures of complexity [Findlay, 2001. Juror comprehension and complexity: strategies to enhance understanding. British Journal of Criminology 41/1, 56.], but rather the particular place of popularly endowed forensic evidence within the circumstantial case.The article explores the utility of a multi-methodological study of comprehension from the perspectives of the proponents, commentators, recipients and observers of the adversarial contest. To this is employed a interactive analysis of important decision-sites and relationships of influence in the trial as they may impact on comprehension and be measured as ‘complex’. 2008-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2044 info:doi/10.1016/j.ijsl.2007.07.001 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3996/viewcontent/JurorComprehensionHardCase_2008_Findlay_afv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Criminal Law Evidence
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Criminal Law
Evidence
spellingShingle Criminal Law
Evidence
FINDLAY, Mark
Juror Comprehension and the Hard Case: Making Forensic Evidence Simpler
description The complexity/comprehension nexus as it impacts on juror decision-making is addressed in the particular context of prosecution-led DNA evidence. Such evidence is for jurors the subject of pre-trial preconceptions, and is notoriously difficult to present and argue before a jury. The article looks at the comprehension of forensic evidence by jurors, a task qualified by the opinion of legal professionals whose responsibility it is to present and interpret such evidence in adversarial contexts.Jurors were surveyed post-verdict in trials where forensic evidence featured in circumstantial cases. These insights into comprehension were qualified by contesting views of legal professionals, and critical reflections from independent observation teams regarding the manner in which this evidence was used and its intended impact on the jury. What results is both declared and implicit indicators of comprehension, not so much against broad measures of complexity [Findlay, 2001. Juror comprehension and complexity: strategies to enhance understanding. British Journal of Criminology 41/1, 56.], but rather the particular place of popularly endowed forensic evidence within the circumstantial case.The article explores the utility of a multi-methodological study of comprehension from the perspectives of the proponents, commentators, recipients and observers of the adversarial contest. To this is employed a interactive analysis of important decision-sites and relationships of influence in the trial as they may impact on comprehension and be measured as ‘complex’.
format text
author FINDLAY, Mark
author_facet FINDLAY, Mark
author_sort FINDLAY, Mark
title Juror Comprehension and the Hard Case: Making Forensic Evidence Simpler
title_short Juror Comprehension and the Hard Case: Making Forensic Evidence Simpler
title_full Juror Comprehension and the Hard Case: Making Forensic Evidence Simpler
title_fullStr Juror Comprehension and the Hard Case: Making Forensic Evidence Simpler
title_full_unstemmed Juror Comprehension and the Hard Case: Making Forensic Evidence Simpler
title_sort juror comprehension and the hard case: making forensic evidence simpler
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2008
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2044
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/3996/viewcontent/JurorComprehensionHardCase_2008_Findlay_afv.pdf
_version_ 1772829893406490624