Why Egregious Errors of Law May yet justify a refusal of enforcement under the 'New York Convention'
Parties on the losing side in international arbitration have long argued that an error of law is a defence to the enforcement of foreign awards. Citing article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention, such parties have argued that a manifest error of law is a violation of public policy. While national co...
Saved in:
Main Author: | TI, Seng Wei, Edward |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2209 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4161/viewcontent/2009SingJLegalStud592__1___1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
A convention on the enforcement of iMSAs and a new model law
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja
Published: (2018) -
Singapore convention series: Why is there no ‘seat’ of mediation?
by: CHONG, Shouyu, et al.
Published: (2019) -
The race towards a New York convention for cross-border mediated settlement agreements: The fable of the tortoise and the hare revisited?
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja
Published: (2014) -
Sovereign immunity in the enforcement of awards against States
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2011) -
Case note: Enforceability of agreements to mediate in English law
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja, et al.
Published: (2020)