The way we think: Ethics, health and the environment in international business

Breaches of ethics and social responsibility in domestic and international business are typically thought to be anchored in such phenomena as greed, dishonesty and conflict of interest. While these forces are frequently at work in international business transactions, there is often another major for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: SMITH, David Nathan
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2215
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4167/viewcontent/TheWayWeThinkEthics_AJWIHLP_2010.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4167
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-41672017-08-11T02:35:43Z The way we think: Ethics, health and the environment in international business SMITH, David Nathan Breaches of ethics and social responsibility in domestic and international business are typically thought to be anchored in such phenomena as greed, dishonesty and conflict of interest. While these forces are frequently at work in international business transactions, there is often another major force at work when failures of ethics and social responsibility occur. This article addresses the question of what is it about the way that transnational company managers and government officials think or don’t think that leads to breaches of ethics and social responsibility – breaches that often result in major health, environmental and social tragedies. The article considers several cases of breaches in ethics and social responsibility: Texaco’s and Shell’s oil exploration and development in Ecuador and Nigeria, the Bhopal gas plant explosion in India, Wal-Mart’s sourcing of timber from China for manufacture of wood products, the trade in biofuels, the trade in toxic financial instruments, and the China milk crisis. The article discusses the roles of a variety of thought-processes in corporate and governmental decision-making and raises the question of whether we do enough in law schools and in business schools and school of public administration to address how companies and governments and their advisors think. 2010-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2215 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4167/viewcontent/TheWayWeThinkEthics_AJWIHLP_2010.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University International business Ethics and social responsibility Lawyer negligence Legal education Due diligence Environmental Law International Business International Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic International business
Ethics and social responsibility
Lawyer negligence
Legal education
Due diligence
Environmental Law
International Business
International Law
spellingShingle International business
Ethics and social responsibility
Lawyer negligence
Legal education
Due diligence
Environmental Law
International Business
International Law
SMITH, David Nathan
The way we think: Ethics, health and the environment in international business
description Breaches of ethics and social responsibility in domestic and international business are typically thought to be anchored in such phenomena as greed, dishonesty and conflict of interest. While these forces are frequently at work in international business transactions, there is often another major force at work when failures of ethics and social responsibility occur. This article addresses the question of what is it about the way that transnational company managers and government officials think or don’t think that leads to breaches of ethics and social responsibility – breaches that often result in major health, environmental and social tragedies. The article considers several cases of breaches in ethics and social responsibility: Texaco’s and Shell’s oil exploration and development in Ecuador and Nigeria, the Bhopal gas plant explosion in India, Wal-Mart’s sourcing of timber from China for manufacture of wood products, the trade in biofuels, the trade in toxic financial instruments, and the China milk crisis. The article discusses the roles of a variety of thought-processes in corporate and governmental decision-making and raises the question of whether we do enough in law schools and in business schools and school of public administration to address how companies and governments and their advisors think.
format text
author SMITH, David Nathan
author_facet SMITH, David Nathan
author_sort SMITH, David Nathan
title The way we think: Ethics, health and the environment in international business
title_short The way we think: Ethics, health and the environment in international business
title_full The way we think: Ethics, health and the environment in international business
title_fullStr The way we think: Ethics, health and the environment in international business
title_full_unstemmed The way we think: Ethics, health and the environment in international business
title_sort way we think: ethics, health and the environment in international business
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2010
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2215
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4167/viewcontent/TheWayWeThinkEthics_AJWIHLP_2010.pdf
_version_ 1772829721836388352