Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore

Squeeze-out transactions are controversial as the controlling shareholders may expropriate the minorities’ shareholdings at unattractive prices. Existing scholarship has focused on the optimal approach towards regulating such transactions in the US and the UK, which have widely dispersed public shar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHEN, Christopher C. H., ZHANG, Wei, WAN, Wai Yee
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2229
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4181/viewcontent/Privatisation_JCLS_220317_afv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4181
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-41812021-05-27T03:38:21Z Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore CHEN, Christopher C. H. ZHANG, Wei WAN, Wai Yee Squeeze-out transactions are controversial as the controlling shareholders may expropriate the minorities’ shareholdings at unattractive prices. Existing scholarship has focused on the optimal approach towards regulating such transactions in the US and the UK, which have widely dispersed public shareholdings, but little attention is placed on jurisdictions with concentrated shareholdings, which may necessitate a different approach given that the prospects of expropriation are very high. This article fills the gap by examining Hong Kong and Singapore, which have concentrated shareholdings. Notwithstanding the fact that they have adapted their corporate and securities laws from the UK, Hong Kong ultimately provides greater minority shareholder protection than Singapore. We present empirical evidence that the differences in regulation have led to a smaller number of squeeze-outs but higher premium payable to minority shareholders in Hong Kong, as compared to Singapore. However, Hong Kong firms experience higher levels of related party transactions prior to the squeeze-outs, which represent another form of tunnelling. We explain that the differences in regulation and discuss the normative implications of our findings. Our study contributes to the broader literature that “law matters” and provides case studies of how interest group politics shape the evolvement of laws and regulation. 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2229 info:doi/10.1080/14735970.2017.1316554 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4181/viewcontent/Privatisation_JCLS_220317_afv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Squeeze-outs delistings going private transactions controlling shareholders takeovers; Hong Kong; Singapore Asian Studies Commercial Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Squeeze-outs
delistings
going private transactions
controlling shareholders
takeovers; Hong Kong; Singapore
Asian Studies
Commercial Law
spellingShingle Squeeze-outs
delistings
going private transactions
controlling shareholders
takeovers; Hong Kong; Singapore
Asian Studies
Commercial Law
CHEN, Christopher C. H.
ZHANG, Wei
WAN, Wai Yee
Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore
description Squeeze-out transactions are controversial as the controlling shareholders may expropriate the minorities’ shareholdings at unattractive prices. Existing scholarship has focused on the optimal approach towards regulating such transactions in the US and the UK, which have widely dispersed public shareholdings, but little attention is placed on jurisdictions with concentrated shareholdings, which may necessitate a different approach given that the prospects of expropriation are very high. This article fills the gap by examining Hong Kong and Singapore, which have concentrated shareholdings. Notwithstanding the fact that they have adapted their corporate and securities laws from the UK, Hong Kong ultimately provides greater minority shareholder protection than Singapore. We present empirical evidence that the differences in regulation have led to a smaller number of squeeze-outs but higher premium payable to minority shareholders in Hong Kong, as compared to Singapore. However, Hong Kong firms experience higher levels of related party transactions prior to the squeeze-outs, which represent another form of tunnelling. We explain that the differences in regulation and discuss the normative implications of our findings. Our study contributes to the broader literature that “law matters” and provides case studies of how interest group politics shape the evolvement of laws and regulation.
format text
author CHEN, Christopher C. H.
ZHANG, Wei
WAN, Wai Yee
author_facet CHEN, Christopher C. H.
ZHANG, Wei
WAN, Wai Yee
author_sort CHEN, Christopher C. H.
title Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore
title_short Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore
title_full Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore
title_fullStr Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore
title_sort regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: the divergence between hong kong and singapore
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2229
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4181/viewcontent/Privatisation_JCLS_220317_afv.pdf
_version_ 1772829451045830656