Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore
Squeeze-out transactions are controversial as the controlling shareholders may expropriate the minorities’ shareholdings at unattractive prices. Existing scholarship has focused on the optimal approach towards regulating such transactions in the US and the UK, which have widely dispersed public shar...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2229 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4181/viewcontent/Privatisation_JCLS_220317_afv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4181 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-41812021-05-27T03:38:21Z Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore CHEN, Christopher C. H. ZHANG, Wei WAN, Wai Yee Squeeze-out transactions are controversial as the controlling shareholders may expropriate the minorities’ shareholdings at unattractive prices. Existing scholarship has focused on the optimal approach towards regulating such transactions in the US and the UK, which have widely dispersed public shareholdings, but little attention is placed on jurisdictions with concentrated shareholdings, which may necessitate a different approach given that the prospects of expropriation are very high. This article fills the gap by examining Hong Kong and Singapore, which have concentrated shareholdings. Notwithstanding the fact that they have adapted their corporate and securities laws from the UK, Hong Kong ultimately provides greater minority shareholder protection than Singapore. We present empirical evidence that the differences in regulation have led to a smaller number of squeeze-outs but higher premium payable to minority shareholders in Hong Kong, as compared to Singapore. However, Hong Kong firms experience higher levels of related party transactions prior to the squeeze-outs, which represent another form of tunnelling. We explain that the differences in regulation and discuss the normative implications of our findings. Our study contributes to the broader literature that “law matters” and provides case studies of how interest group politics shape the evolvement of laws and regulation. 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2229 info:doi/10.1080/14735970.2017.1316554 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4181/viewcontent/Privatisation_JCLS_220317_afv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Squeeze-outs delistings going private transactions controlling shareholders takeovers; Hong Kong; Singapore Asian Studies Commercial Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Squeeze-outs delistings going private transactions controlling shareholders takeovers; Hong Kong; Singapore Asian Studies Commercial Law |
spellingShingle |
Squeeze-outs delistings going private transactions controlling shareholders takeovers; Hong Kong; Singapore Asian Studies Commercial Law CHEN, Christopher C. H. ZHANG, Wei WAN, Wai Yee Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore |
description |
Squeeze-out transactions are controversial as the controlling shareholders may expropriate the minorities’ shareholdings at unattractive prices. Existing scholarship has focused on the optimal approach towards regulating such transactions in the US and the UK, which have widely dispersed public shareholdings, but little attention is placed on jurisdictions with concentrated shareholdings, which may necessitate a different approach given that the prospects of expropriation are very high. This article fills the gap by examining Hong Kong and Singapore, which have concentrated shareholdings. Notwithstanding the fact that they have adapted their corporate and securities laws from the UK, Hong Kong ultimately provides greater minority shareholder protection than Singapore.
We present empirical evidence that the differences in regulation have led to a smaller number of squeeze-outs but higher premium payable to minority shareholders in Hong Kong, as compared to Singapore. However, Hong Kong firms experience higher levels of related party transactions prior to the squeeze-outs, which represent another form of tunnelling. We explain that the differences in regulation and discuss the normative implications of our findings. Our study contributes to the broader literature that “law matters” and provides case studies of how interest group politics shape the evolvement of laws and regulation. |
format |
text |
author |
CHEN, Christopher C. H. ZHANG, Wei WAN, Wai Yee |
author_facet |
CHEN, Christopher C. H. ZHANG, Wei WAN, Wai Yee |
author_sort |
CHEN, Christopher C. H. |
title |
Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore |
title_short |
Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore |
title_full |
Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore |
title_fullStr |
Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: The divergence between Hong Kong and Singapore |
title_sort |
regulating squeeze-out techniques by controlling shareholders: the divergence between hong kong and singapore |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2229 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4181/viewcontent/Privatisation_JCLS_220317_afv.pdf |
_version_ |
1772829451045830656 |