The discretionary penalty for murder: Guidance at last

In a much awaited decision, the Court of Appeal (“CA”) has finally provided some guidelines to judges on whether or not to impose the discretionary death penalty in murder cases. The decision of a specially constituted court of five judges, in Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 1, has made h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: MOHAN, S. Chandra
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2267
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4219/viewcontent/20150225_S._Chandra_Mohan_The_Discretionary_Death_Penalty_for_Murder_Guidance_at_Last.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4219
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-42192017-08-31T03:27:14Z The discretionary penalty for murder: Guidance at last MOHAN, S. Chandra In a much awaited decision, the Court of Appeal (“CA”) has finally provided some guidelines to judges on whether or not to impose the discretionary death penalty in murder cases. The decision of a specially constituted court of five judges, in Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 1, has made history of sorts. It is a case where five judges, of whom two delivered dissenting judgments, sat to hear an appeal from the decision of a single High Court judge; and is the first CA decision under the 2012 Penal Code amendments which provides for a discretionary death penalty for murder. 2015-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2267 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4219/viewcontent/20150225_S._Chandra_Mohan_The_Discretionary_Death_Penalty_for_Murder_Guidance_at_Last.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Criminal Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Criminal Law
spellingShingle Criminal Law
MOHAN, S. Chandra
The discretionary penalty for murder: Guidance at last
description In a much awaited decision, the Court of Appeal (“CA”) has finally provided some guidelines to judges on whether or not to impose the discretionary death penalty in murder cases. The decision of a specially constituted court of five judges, in Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 1, has made history of sorts. It is a case where five judges, of whom two delivered dissenting judgments, sat to hear an appeal from the decision of a single High Court judge; and is the first CA decision under the 2012 Penal Code amendments which provides for a discretionary death penalty for murder.
format text
author MOHAN, S. Chandra
author_facet MOHAN, S. Chandra
author_sort MOHAN, S. Chandra
title The discretionary penalty for murder: Guidance at last
title_short The discretionary penalty for murder: Guidance at last
title_full The discretionary penalty for murder: Guidance at last
title_fullStr The discretionary penalty for murder: Guidance at last
title_full_unstemmed The discretionary penalty for murder: Guidance at last
title_sort discretionary penalty for murder: guidance at last
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2267
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4219/viewcontent/20150225_S._Chandra_Mohan_The_Discretionary_Death_Penalty_for_Murder_Guidance_at_Last.pdf
_version_ 1772829526423764992