Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP

Recently, the Court of,4ppeal in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v. Public Prosecutor took the view thatthe law on common intention was not adequately settled in Singapore despite the 138-year history ofs. 34 ofthe Penal Code. It went on to give an extensive review of the cases interpreting the section...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: CHUA, Eunice
格式: text
語言:English
出版: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2011
主題:
在線閱讀:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2302
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4254/viewcontent/29SingLRev21.pdf
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4254
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-42542017-10-06T07:35:55Z Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP CHUA, Eunice Recently, the Court of,4ppeal in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v. Public Prosecutor took the view thatthe law on common intention was not adequately settled in Singapore despite the 138-year history ofs. 34 ofthe Penal Code. It went on to give an extensive review of the cases interpreting the section aswell as its Indian equivalent, before setting out the proper approach to take in "twin crime" commonintention cases, focusing specifically on the mens rea element required in order to establish constructiveliabilityfor the secondary crime. This case note seeks to highlight the changes brought about byDaniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v. Public Prosecutor andto comment on the significance ofthese changes. 2011-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2302 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4254/viewcontent/29SingLRev21.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
spellingShingle Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
CHUA, Eunice
Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
description Recently, the Court of,4ppeal in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v. Public Prosecutor took the view thatthe law on common intention was not adequately settled in Singapore despite the 138-year history ofs. 34 ofthe Penal Code. It went on to give an extensive review of the cases interpreting the section aswell as its Indian equivalent, before setting out the proper approach to take in "twin crime" commonintention cases, focusing specifically on the mens rea element required in order to establish constructiveliabilityfor the secondary crime. This case note seeks to highlight the changes brought about byDaniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v. Public Prosecutor andto comment on the significance ofthese changes.
format text
author CHUA, Eunice
author_facet CHUA, Eunice
author_sort CHUA, Eunice
title Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
title_short Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
title_full Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
title_fullStr Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
title_full_unstemmed Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
title_sort raising the bar for the mens rea requirement in common intention cases: daniel vijay s/o katherasan v pp
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2011
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2302
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4254/viewcontent/29SingLRev21.pdf
_version_ 1772829313798766592