Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases: Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
Recently, the Court of,4ppeal in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v. Public Prosecutor took the view thatthe law on common intention was not adequately settled in Singapore despite the 138-year history ofs. 34 ofthe Penal Code. It went on to give an extensive review of the cases interpreting the section...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHUA, Eunice |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2302 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4254/viewcontent/29SingLRev21.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Raising the Bar for the Mens Rea Requirement in Common Intention Cases
by: CHUA, Eunice
Published: (2011) -
The Final Twist in Common Intention? Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v. Public Prosecutor
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2011) -
A dispute in Chancery Lane: Re-considering the resulting and common intention constructive trust
by: TANG, Hang Wu
Published: (2015) -
The precise ambit of the sealing requirement for deeds
by: TAN, Robbie Shih Rong
Published: (2022) -
Non-satisfaction of pre-arbitration requirements: Moving away from conditions precedent towards the admissibility of a claim – NWA v NVF
by: CHAN, Darius, et al.
Published: (2022)