Recent developments concerning similar fact evidence in Singapore: Pushing the boundaries of admissibility – PP v Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh [2017] 3 SLR 66; Micheal Anak Garing v PP [2017] 1 SLR 748

Recent developments concerning similar fact evidence in Singapore: Pushing the boundaries of admissibility – PP v Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh [2017] 3 SLR 66; Micheal Anak Garing v PP [2017] 1 SLR 748

This piece addressestwo recent local decisions on similar fact evidence that demonstratethe court’s difficulties with reconciling the provisions of the Evidence Actwith a more flexible approach that can be developed through the common law.These two cases extend the basis for admitting similar fact e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHUA, Eunice
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Similar Fact Evidence
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Evidence
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2579
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4537/viewcontent/Eunice_Chua___PP_v_Ranjit_Singh_Gill__case_note___Published_on_e_First_7_February_2018_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English

Internet

https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2579
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4537/viewcontent/Eunice_Chua___PP_v_Ranjit_Singh_Gill__case_note___Published_on_e_First_7_February_2018_.pdf

Similar Items