The commercialisation of equity

This paper analyses the jurisprudence on the relevance of the commercial context to principles of the law of equity and trusts. We criticise recent UK Supreme Court decisions in the area (chiefly Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria, FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners and AIB Group v Mark...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YIP, Man, LEE, James
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2336
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4288/viewcontent/lest12167__1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4288
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-42882018-04-25T01:39:58Z The commercialisation of equity YIP, Man LEE, James This paper analyses the jurisprudence on the relevance of the commercial context to principles of the law of equity and trusts. We criticise recent UK Supreme Court decisions in the area (chiefly Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria, FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners and AIB Group v Mark Redler & Co) and identify a trend of the 'commercialisation' of the issues. The cases are placed in comparative context and it is argued that there is an unsatisfactory pattern of judicial reasoning, exhibiting a preference for some degree of unarticulated flexibility in commercial adjudication. But the price of that flexibility is a lack of doctrinal coherence and the development of equitable principles that will apply in, and beyond, the commercial context. We also argue that this trend has important implications for the coming rounds of Supreme Court appointments. 2017-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2336 info:doi/10.1111/lest.12167 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4288/viewcontent/lest12167__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Commercial Law Jurisprudence
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Commercial Law
Jurisprudence
spellingShingle Commercial Law
Jurisprudence
YIP, Man
LEE, James
The commercialisation of equity
description This paper analyses the jurisprudence on the relevance of the commercial context to principles of the law of equity and trusts. We criticise recent UK Supreme Court decisions in the area (chiefly Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria, FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners and AIB Group v Mark Redler & Co) and identify a trend of the 'commercialisation' of the issues. The cases are placed in comparative context and it is argued that there is an unsatisfactory pattern of judicial reasoning, exhibiting a preference for some degree of unarticulated flexibility in commercial adjudication. But the price of that flexibility is a lack of doctrinal coherence and the development of equitable principles that will apply in, and beyond, the commercial context. We also argue that this trend has important implications for the coming rounds of Supreme Court appointments.
format text
author YIP, Man
LEE, James
author_facet YIP, Man
LEE, James
author_sort YIP, Man
title The commercialisation of equity
title_short The commercialisation of equity
title_full The commercialisation of equity
title_fullStr The commercialisation of equity
title_full_unstemmed The commercialisation of equity
title_sort commercialisation of equity
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2336
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4288/viewcontent/lest12167__1_.pdf
_version_ 1772829314166816768