Injunctions restraining calls on performance bonds: Is fraud the only ground in Singapore?
This paper traces the divergence of Singapore law from English law with regard to the grounds upon which a call on a performance bond can be restrained, in particular the recent recognition of the Singapore Court of Appeal's ruling that "unconscionability" is a separate ground to rest...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | LOH, Quentin, TANG, Hang Wu |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2000
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2379 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4337/viewcontent/Injunctions_restraining_calls_on_performance_bonds.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Mareva Injunction and crypto fraud
by: YIP, Man
Published: (2024) -
Foreign judgments and contracts: The anti-enforcement injunction
by: YEO, Tiong Min
Published: (2021) -
Breach of Agreement Versus Vexatious, Oppressive and Unconscionable Conduct: Clarifying their Relationship in the Law of Anti-Suit Injunctions
by: CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
Published: (2015) -
Equity in the marketplace: Reviewing the use of unconscionability to restrain calls on performance bonds
by: TANG, Hang Wu
Published: (2017) -
Unconscionable Calls on Performance Bonds: A Bold New Exception
by: Low, Kee Yang, et al.
Published: (2006)