Foskett v. McKeown – Hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment?

The recent judgment of the House of Lords in Foskett is extremely important as it straddles insurance law, property law, tracing and unjust enrichment. First, it establishes the proposition that it is possible to trace misappropriated moneys wrongfully paid as premiums into the proceeds of a policy....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TANG, Hang Wu
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2389
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4347/viewcontent/Tang.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4347
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-43472017-11-23T02:25:29Z Foskett v. McKeown – Hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment? TANG, Hang Wu The recent judgment of the House of Lords in Foskett is extremely important as it straddles insurance law, property law, tracing and unjust enrichment. First, it establishes the proposition that it is possible to trace misappropriated moneys wrongfully paid as premiums into the proceeds of a policy. Second, two of the Law Lords contemplated the abolition of the distinction between the rules for tracing in law and tracing in equity. Third, the judgments of the Law Lords contain valuable guidance as to the context in which equitable ownership and the law of unjust enrichment should be viewed. 2001-11-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2389 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4347/viewcontent/Tang.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Property Law and Real Estate
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Property Law and Real Estate
spellingShingle Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Property Law and Real Estate
TANG, Hang Wu
Foskett v. McKeown – Hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment?
description The recent judgment of the House of Lords in Foskett is extremely important as it straddles insurance law, property law, tracing and unjust enrichment. First, it establishes the proposition that it is possible to trace misappropriated moneys wrongfully paid as premiums into the proceeds of a policy. Second, two of the Law Lords contemplated the abolition of the distinction between the rules for tracing in law and tracing in equity. Third, the judgments of the Law Lords contain valuable guidance as to the context in which equitable ownership and the law of unjust enrichment should be viewed.
format text
author TANG, Hang Wu
author_facet TANG, Hang Wu
author_sort TANG, Hang Wu
title Foskett v. McKeown – Hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment?
title_short Foskett v. McKeown – Hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment?
title_full Foskett v. McKeown – Hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment?
title_fullStr Foskett v. McKeown – Hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment?
title_full_unstemmed Foskett v. McKeown – Hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment?
title_sort foskett v. mckeown – hard-nosed property rights or unjust enrichment?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2001
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2389
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4347/viewcontent/Tang.pdf
_version_ 1772829723488944128