Board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? An empirical study of related party transactions in Hong Kong and Singapore

In this article, we examine a general question: is the legal transplantation of corporate governance rule effective in curtailing agency costs? Entering into the 21st century, we have seen reforms of corporate governance standards in the Far East since the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997, including i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHEN, Christopher C. H., WAN, Wai Yee, ZHANG, Wei
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2815
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4773/viewcontent/SSRN_id2991423.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4773
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-47732020-04-01T06:31:05Z Board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? An empirical study of related party transactions in Hong Kong and Singapore CHEN, Christopher C. H. WAN, Wai Yee ZHANG, Wei In this article, we examine a general question: is the legal transplantation of corporate governance rule effective in curtailing agency costs? Entering into the 21st century, we have seen reforms of corporate governance standards in the Far East since the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997, including in Hong Kong and Singapore. These reforms built on the Anglo-American model of corporate governance in the UK and US supported by broad academic literature of connecting better corporate governance with firm value and identifying the association of tunneling or wrongdoings with poor corporate governance practices. The idea is also to provide more checks-and-balances and monitoring corporate management and insiders to protect the interests of shareholders and to prevent controlling shareholders from extracting the company’s resources into their own pocket. Among various corporate governance regimes, one important tool is to improve board independence, which has seemed to become the panacea of corporate governance problems by policymakers. 2018-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2815 info:doi/10.1111/jels.12197 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4773/viewcontent/SSRN_id2991423.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Corporate governance Legal transplants Related party transactions Tunnelling Asian Studies Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commercial Law International Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Corporate governance
Legal transplants
Related party transactions Tunnelling
Asian Studies
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Commercial Law
International Law
spellingShingle Corporate governance
Legal transplants
Related party transactions Tunnelling
Asian Studies
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Commercial Law
International Law
CHEN, Christopher C. H.
WAN, Wai Yee
ZHANG, Wei
Board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? An empirical study of related party transactions in Hong Kong and Singapore
description In this article, we examine a general question: is the legal transplantation of corporate governance rule effective in curtailing agency costs? Entering into the 21st century, we have seen reforms of corporate governance standards in the Far East since the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997, including in Hong Kong and Singapore. These reforms built on the Anglo-American model of corporate governance in the UK and US supported by broad academic literature of connecting better corporate governance with firm value and identifying the association of tunneling or wrongdoings with poor corporate governance practices. The idea is also to provide more checks-and-balances and monitoring corporate management and insiders to protect the interests of shareholders and to prevent controlling shareholders from extracting the company’s resources into their own pocket. Among various corporate governance regimes, one important tool is to improve board independence, which has seemed to become the panacea of corporate governance problems by policymakers.
format text
author CHEN, Christopher C. H.
WAN, Wai Yee
ZHANG, Wei
author_facet CHEN, Christopher C. H.
WAN, Wai Yee
ZHANG, Wei
author_sort CHEN, Christopher C. H.
title Board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? An empirical study of related party transactions in Hong Kong and Singapore
title_short Board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? An empirical study of related party transactions in Hong Kong and Singapore
title_full Board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? An empirical study of related party transactions in Hong Kong and Singapore
title_fullStr Board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? An empirical study of related party transactions in Hong Kong and Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? An empirical study of related party transactions in Hong Kong and Singapore
title_sort board independence as a panacea to tunnelling? an empirical study of related party transactions in hong kong and singapore
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2815
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4773/viewcontent/SSRN_id2991423.pdf
_version_ 1772829549521797120