The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency
The SingaporeHigh Court decision in Re Taisoo Suk is a notable developmentof the law on cross-border insolvency for two reasons. First, the decision hasimplications on the relationship between the admiralty jurisdiction inSingapore and the Singapore court’sinherent powers in the context of cross-bor...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2858 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4816 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-48162018-12-27T09:08:58Z The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency WATTERS, Casey Gene CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny The SingaporeHigh Court decision in Re Taisoo Suk is a notable developmentof the law on cross-border insolvency for two reasons. First, the decision hasimplications on the relationship between the admiralty jurisdiction inSingapore and the Singapore court’sinherent powers in the context of cross-border insolvency. Second, it is the most recent in aseries of cases breaking from Rubin v Eurofinance SA and developingSingapore’s common law authority to assist foreign insolvency proceedings. WhileSingapore subsequently adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, the increased scope of the court’s inherent authority remains aflexible tool available to debtors and, whereas the Model Law’sadoption in the Companies Act does not extend to personal bankruptcy, the decisionpaved the way for common law recognition of foreign personal bankruptcyproceedings.The case also establishes persuasive precedent for jurisdictions seeking to adopta more flexible common law approach.Whereas previousdecisions have already recognized the court’s authority to remit assets for distributionin main proceedings, the decision in this case went even further: itestablished a test for the recognition of insolvency proceedings, and allowedthe grant of an injunction within Singapore that was premised on the court’sinherent jurisdiction to assist foreign insolvency proceedings and which alsoextended to the subsidiaries of the insolvent company, thereby ignoring thesubsidiaries’ separate legal identities. The ramifications and possiblerationales of these developments will be discussed subsequently in this note. 2018-10-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2858 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Admiralty Asian Studies Courts Dispute Resolution and Arbitration |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Admiralty Asian Studies Courts Dispute Resolution and Arbitration |
spellingShingle |
Admiralty Asian Studies Courts Dispute Resolution and Arbitration WATTERS, Casey Gene CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency |
description |
The SingaporeHigh Court decision in Re Taisoo Suk is a notable developmentof the law on cross-border insolvency for two reasons. First, the decision hasimplications on the relationship between the admiralty jurisdiction inSingapore and the Singapore court’sinherent powers in the context of cross-border insolvency. Second, it is the most recent in aseries of cases breaking from Rubin v Eurofinance SA and developingSingapore’s common law authority to assist foreign insolvency proceedings. WhileSingapore subsequently adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, the increased scope of the court’s inherent authority remains aflexible tool available to debtors and, whereas the Model Law’sadoption in the Companies Act does not extend to personal bankruptcy, the decisionpaved the way for common law recognition of foreign personal bankruptcyproceedings.The case also establishes persuasive precedent for jurisdictions seeking to adopta more flexible common law approach.Whereas previousdecisions have already recognized the court’s authority to remit assets for distributionin main proceedings, the decision in this case went even further: itestablished a test for the recognition of insolvency proceedings, and allowedthe grant of an injunction within Singapore that was premised on the court’sinherent jurisdiction to assist foreign insolvency proceedings and which alsoextended to the subsidiaries of the insolvent company, thereby ignoring thesubsidiaries’ separate legal identities. The ramifications and possiblerationales of these developments will be discussed subsequently in this note. |
format |
text |
author |
WATTERS, Casey Gene CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny |
author_facet |
WATTERS, Casey Gene CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny |
author_sort |
WATTERS, Casey Gene |
title |
The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency |
title_short |
The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency |
title_full |
The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency |
title_fullStr |
The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency |
title_full_unstemmed |
The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency |
title_sort |
common law principle of universality extended in the wake of hanjin shipping’s insolvency |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2858 |
_version_ |
1772829318612779008 |