The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency

The SingaporeHigh Court decision in Re Taisoo Suk is a notable developmentof the law on cross-border insolvency for two reasons. First, the decision hasimplications on the relationship between the admiralty jurisdiction inSingapore and the Singapore court’sinherent powers in the context of cross-bor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: WATTERS, Casey Gene, CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2858
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-4816
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-48162018-12-27T09:08:58Z The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency WATTERS, Casey Gene CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny The SingaporeHigh Court decision in Re Taisoo Suk is a notable developmentof the law on cross-border insolvency for two reasons. First, the decision hasimplications on the relationship between the admiralty jurisdiction inSingapore and the Singapore court’sinherent powers in the context of cross-border insolvency. Second, it is the most recent in aseries of cases breaking from Rubin v Eurofinance SA and developingSingapore’s common law authority to assist foreign insolvency proceedings. WhileSingapore subsequently adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, the increased scope of the court’s inherent authority remains aflexible tool available to debtors and, whereas the Model Law’sadoption in the Companies Act does not extend to personal bankruptcy, the decisionpaved the way for common law recognition of foreign personal bankruptcyproceedings.The case also establishes persuasive precedent for jurisdictions seeking to adopta more flexible common law approach.Whereas previousdecisions have already recognized the court’s authority to remit assets for distributionin main proceedings, the decision in this case went even further: itestablished a test for the recognition of insolvency proceedings, and allowedthe grant of an injunction within Singapore that was premised on the court’sinherent jurisdiction to assist foreign insolvency proceedings and which alsoextended to the subsidiaries of the insolvent company, thereby ignoring thesubsidiaries’ separate legal identities. The ramifications and possiblerationales of these developments will be discussed subsequently in this note. 2018-10-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2858 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Admiralty Asian Studies Courts Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Admiralty
Asian Studies
Courts
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
spellingShingle Admiralty
Asian Studies
Courts
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
WATTERS, Casey Gene
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency
description The SingaporeHigh Court decision in Re Taisoo Suk is a notable developmentof the law on cross-border insolvency for two reasons. First, the decision hasimplications on the relationship between the admiralty jurisdiction inSingapore and the Singapore court’sinherent powers in the context of cross-border insolvency. Second, it is the most recent in aseries of cases breaking from Rubin v Eurofinance SA and developingSingapore’s common law authority to assist foreign insolvency proceedings. WhileSingapore subsequently adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, the increased scope of the court’s inherent authority remains aflexible tool available to debtors and, whereas the Model Law’sadoption in the Companies Act does not extend to personal bankruptcy, the decisionpaved the way for common law recognition of foreign personal bankruptcyproceedings.The case also establishes persuasive precedent for jurisdictions seeking to adopta more flexible common law approach.Whereas previousdecisions have already recognized the court’s authority to remit assets for distributionin main proceedings, the decision in this case went even further: itestablished a test for the recognition of insolvency proceedings, and allowedthe grant of an injunction within Singapore that was premised on the court’sinherent jurisdiction to assist foreign insolvency proceedings and which alsoextended to the subsidiaries of the insolvent company, thereby ignoring thesubsidiaries’ separate legal identities. The ramifications and possiblerationales of these developments will be discussed subsequently in this note.
format text
author WATTERS, Casey Gene
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
author_facet WATTERS, Casey Gene
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
author_sort WATTERS, Casey Gene
title The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency
title_short The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency
title_full The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency
title_fullStr The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency
title_full_unstemmed The common law principle of universality extended In the wake of Hanjin Shipping’s insolvency
title_sort common law principle of universality extended in the wake of hanjin shipping’s insolvency
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2858
_version_ 1772829318612779008