Should claims on a bill of exchange be stayed in favour of arbitration?
This note examines the decision of the Singapore High Court in Piallo GmbH v Yafriro International Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 260, and suggests that it points the way forward by saying that parties who agree to refer all their disputes to arbitration should generally be taken to have included within this c...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2885 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | This note examines the decision of the Singapore High Court in Piallo GmbH v Yafriro International Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 260, and suggests that it points the way forward by saying that parties who agree to refer all their disputes to arbitration should generally be taken to have included within this claims on a bill of exchange. |
|---|