Supporting party autonomy in the enforcement of cross-border mediated settlement agreements: A brave new world or unchartered territory?
The last decade has seen a palpable rise of domestic and international instruments tofacilitate the enforcement of cross-border mediated settlement agreements. The EU MediationDirective required member states to provide for enforcement of such agreements. Common lawjurisdictions including Singapore,...
Saved in:
Main Author: | QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2909 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4867/viewcontent/Dorcas_Quek_Anderson_Supporting_party_autonomy_in_the_enforcement_of_MSAs_050618.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 4
by: HOWARD, Anna, et al.
Published: (2016) -
UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 3
by: QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas, et al.
Published: (2016) -
A matter of interpretation? Understanding and applying mediation standards for the cross-border enforcement of mediated settlement agreements
by: Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON,
Published: (2020) -
UNCITRAL and the enforceability of iMSAs: the debate heats up – Part 2
by: QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Enforcement of mediated settlement agreements in Asia – A path towards convergence
by: CHUA, Eunice
Published: (2019)