The constitutionality of ouster clauses: Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Attorney-General [2018] SGHC 112
Section 33B(4) of Singapore’s Misuse of Drugs Act purportedly partly ousts judicial review of the Public Prosecutor’s determination of whether a drug trafficker has substantively assisted the anti-drug enforcement agency. This paper argues that Singapore’s High Court erred in holding this provision...
Saved in:
Main Author: | ONG, Benjamin Joshua |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2915 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4873/viewcontent/The_constitutionality_of_ouster_clauses__repositories_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Constitutional supremacy, inherent powers, and orders that damages or costs be paid in instalments: Tan Meow Hiang v Ong Kay Yong [2023] SGHC 286
by: ONG, Benjamin Joshua
Published: (2024) -
Overview of matrimonial finance in other jurisdictions
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2017) -
Essays on mediation: Dealing with disputes in the 21st century
by: MACDUFF, Ian
Published: (2016) -
IM Skaugen SE v MAN Diesel & Turbo SE [2018] SGHC 123
by: CHONG, Adeline
Published: (2018) -
Mediating in the shadow of Australian law: Structural influences on ADR
by: ALEXANDER, Nadja
Published: (2006)