A reformulated test for unconscionability
Apart from its interesting facts, this case, BOM v BOK [2018] SGCA 83, is significant for its rejection of a “broad” doctrine of unconscionability, the existence of which has been a matter of some debate in English law, and which has been accepted in Australia (see Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | OOI, Vincent, YONG, Walter |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2927 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4885/viewcontent/ReformulatedTest_Unconscionability_sv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Economic Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionability
by: KOH, Pearlie
Published: (2009) -
Economic Duress, Undue Influence, and Unconscionability
by: Phang, Andrew Boon Leong
Published: (2004) -
Commercial Certainty, Mistake, Unconscionability and Implied Terms
by: PHANG, Andrew
Published: (2002) -
Economic Duress and a Drop of Fairness: A Singapore Perspective
by: KOH, Pearlie
Published: (2003) -
Australia's Proposed Exercise in Contract Law Reform: International Convergence and Regional Implications
by: BITAS, Basil C.
Published: (2013)