Interpreting contracts under Singapore law in international arbitration — The sequel
Article 16(3) of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration provides in relevant part that, “if the arbitral tribunal rules as a preliminary question that it has jurisdiction, any party may request … the court … to decide the matter”. One question that arises is, to the extent is...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHAN, Darius |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3042 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5000/viewcontent/Interpreting_Contracts_under_Singapore_Law_in_International_Arbitration___The_Sequel___The_Singapore_Law_Gazette.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Interpreting contracts under Singapore law in international arbitration
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2016) -
The law and theory of international commercial arbitration in Singapore
by: CHAN, Darius, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Assignments, assignees, and the burden of an arbitration clause
by: THAM, Chee Ho
Published: (2023) -
Singapore's International Arbitration Act 2012 vs Hong Kong's Arbitration Ordinance 2011
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2012) -
Arbitration Law Developments in Singapore
by: PULLE, Austin Ignatius
Published: (2010)