Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited
In November 2011, the Singapore High Court set aside three related international arbitration awards on the basis that the tribunal had gone beyond the scope of matters submitted to it by making a decision based on an issue not formally pleaded.1 The High Court decision has now been reversed. In reve...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3065 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5023 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-50232020-02-13T09:42:03Z Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited CHAN, Darius In November 2011, the Singapore High Court set aside three related international arbitration awards on the basis that the tribunal had gone beyond the scope of matters submitted to it by making a decision based on an issue not formally pleaded.1 The High Court decision has now been reversed. In reversing the setting aside of the awards the Singapore Court of Appeal considered the role of pleadings in international arbitration. The appeal essentially turned on two issues: (i) whether the issue that was allegedly not pleaded was within the scope of the parties’ submission to arbitration; and (ii) whether any prejudice had occurred. 2012-10-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3065 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Dispute Resolution and Arbitration |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Asian Studies Dispute Resolution and Arbitration |
spellingShingle |
Asian Studies Dispute Resolution and Arbitration CHAN, Darius Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited |
description |
In November 2011, the Singapore High Court set aside three related international arbitration awards on the basis that the tribunal had gone beyond the scope of matters submitted to it by making a decision based on an issue not formally pleaded.1 The High Court decision has now been reversed. In reversing the setting aside of the awards the Singapore Court of Appeal considered the role of pleadings in international arbitration. The appeal essentially turned on two issues: (i) whether the issue that was allegedly not pleaded was within the scope of the parties’ submission to arbitration; and (ii) whether any prejudice had occurred. |
format |
text |
author |
CHAN, Darius |
author_facet |
CHAN, Darius |
author_sort |
CHAN, Darius |
title |
Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited |
title_short |
Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited |
title_full |
Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited |
title_fullStr |
Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited |
title_full_unstemmed |
Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited |
title_sort |
setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings revisited |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3065 |
_version_ |
1772829593717178368 |