Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds)
The project which gave rise to this book was motivated by a dearth of existing scholarship on the role of plurality within (as opposed to among) Southeast Asian nations (at p 5); how plurality can serve as a “source of constitutional dynamism” rather than of “constitutional contestations” (at p 6);...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3069 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5027 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-50272020-09-04T08:06:49Z Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds) ONG, Benjamin Joshua The project which gave rise to this book was motivated by a dearth of existing scholarship on the role of plurality within (as opposed to among) Southeast Asian nations (at p 5); how plurality can serve as a “source of constitutional dynamism” rather than of “constitutional contestations” (at p 6); and the role of constitutional practice (as opposed to the features which institutions possess on paper) (at p 6). The book aims to address these gaps through a collection of essays, each of which focuses on the constitutional orders in one or two Southeast Asian countries. As the editors Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son recognise, the diversity of experiences and constitutional responses is such that “there is no single model of pluralist constitutions in Southeast Asia” (at p 15). After all, the nature and effects of pluralism depend on the extent of division of a society and the types of plurality (at p 10). Moreover, because pluralism itself is ‘dynamic’ in the sense that “a pluralist constitution should be able to reconsider new constitutional claims and modify its existing settlement to address them” (at pp 12-13), drawing comparisons is not straightforward because of changes within each country over time. Yet, the book does a good job of presenting the complexities of each country’s constitutional order; and, as the editors point out in their useful introduction, interesting patterns and contrasts emerge when the various essays are placed side by side (at pp 15-18). The result is a study that is more than the sum of its parts. 2020-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3069 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Constitutional Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Asian Studies Constitutional Law |
spellingShingle |
Asian Studies Constitutional Law ONG, Benjamin Joshua Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds) |
description |
The project which gave rise to this book was motivated by a dearth of existing scholarship on the role of plurality within (as opposed to among) Southeast Asian nations (at p 5); how plurality can serve as a “source of constitutional dynamism” rather than of “constitutional contestations” (at p 6); and the role of constitutional practice (as opposed to the features which institutions possess on paper) (at p 6). The book aims to address these gaps through a collection of essays, each of which focuses on the constitutional orders in one or two Southeast Asian countries. As the editors Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son recognise, the diversity of experiences and constitutional responses is such that “there is no single model of pluralist constitutions in Southeast Asia” (at p 15). After all, the nature and effects of pluralism depend on the extent of division of a society and the types of plurality (at p 10). Moreover, because pluralism itself is ‘dynamic’ in the sense that “a pluralist constitution should be able to reconsider new constitutional claims and modify its existing settlement to address them” (at pp 12-13), drawing comparisons is not straightforward because of changes within each country over time. Yet, the book does a good job of presenting the complexities of each country’s constitutional order; and, as the editors point out in their useful introduction, interesting patterns and contrasts emerge when the various essays are placed side by side (at pp 15-18). The result is a study that is more than the sum of its parts. |
format |
text |
author |
ONG, Benjamin Joshua |
author_facet |
ONG, Benjamin Joshua |
author_sort |
ONG, Benjamin Joshua |
title |
Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds) |
title_short |
Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds) |
title_full |
Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds) |
title_fullStr |
Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds) |
title_sort |
review of pluralist constitutions in southeast asia by jaclyn l neo and bui ngoc son (eds) |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3069 |
_version_ |
1772829609364029440 |