Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds)

The project which gave rise to this book was motivated by a dearth of existing scholarship on the role of plurality within (as opposed to among) Southeast Asian nations (at p 5); how plurality can serve as a “source of constitutional dynamism” rather than of “constitutional contestations” (at p 6);...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ONG, Benjamin Joshua
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3069
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5027
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-50272020-09-04T08:06:49Z Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds) ONG, Benjamin Joshua The project which gave rise to this book was motivated by a dearth of existing scholarship on the role of plurality within (as opposed to among) Southeast Asian nations (at p 5); how plurality can serve as a “source of constitutional dynamism” rather than of “constitutional contestations” (at p 6); and the role of constitutional practice (as opposed to the features which institutions possess on paper) (at p 6). The book aims to address these gaps through a collection of essays, each of which focuses on the constitutional orders in one or two Southeast Asian countries. As the editors Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son recognise, the diversity of experiences and constitutional responses is such that “there is no single model of pluralist constitutions in Southeast Asia” (at p 15). After all, the nature and effects of pluralism depend on the extent of division of a society and the types of plurality (at p 10). Moreover, because pluralism itself is ‘dynamic’ in the sense that “a pluralist constitution should be able to reconsider new constitutional claims and modify its existing settlement to address them” (at pp 12-13), drawing comparisons is not straightforward because of changes within each country over time. Yet, the book does a good job of presenting the complexities of each country’s constitutional order; and, as the editors point out in their useful introduction, interesting patterns and contrasts emerge when the various essays are placed side by side (at pp 15-18). The result is a study that is more than the sum of its parts. 2020-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3069 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Constitutional Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Asian Studies
Constitutional Law
spellingShingle Asian Studies
Constitutional Law
ONG, Benjamin Joshua
Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds)
description The project which gave rise to this book was motivated by a dearth of existing scholarship on the role of plurality within (as opposed to among) Southeast Asian nations (at p 5); how plurality can serve as a “source of constitutional dynamism” rather than of “constitutional contestations” (at p 6); and the role of constitutional practice (as opposed to the features which institutions possess on paper) (at p 6). The book aims to address these gaps through a collection of essays, each of which focuses on the constitutional orders in one or two Southeast Asian countries. As the editors Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son recognise, the diversity of experiences and constitutional responses is such that “there is no single model of pluralist constitutions in Southeast Asia” (at p 15). After all, the nature and effects of pluralism depend on the extent of division of a society and the types of plurality (at p 10). Moreover, because pluralism itself is ‘dynamic’ in the sense that “a pluralist constitution should be able to reconsider new constitutional claims and modify its existing settlement to address them” (at pp 12-13), drawing comparisons is not straightforward because of changes within each country over time. Yet, the book does a good job of presenting the complexities of each country’s constitutional order; and, as the editors point out in their useful introduction, interesting patterns and contrasts emerge when the various essays are placed side by side (at pp 15-18). The result is a study that is more than the sum of its parts.
format text
author ONG, Benjamin Joshua
author_facet ONG, Benjamin Joshua
author_sort ONG, Benjamin Joshua
title Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds)
title_short Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds)
title_full Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds)
title_fullStr Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds)
title_full_unstemmed Review of Pluralist Constitutions in Southeast Asia by Jaclyn L Neo and Bui Ngoc Son (eds)
title_sort review of pluralist constitutions in southeast asia by jaclyn l neo and bui ngoc son (eds)
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3069
_version_ 1772829609364029440