The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law
It is well understood that the exchange of information between horizontal competitors can violate competition law provisions in both the European Union (EU) and the United States, namely, article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and section 1 of the Sherman Act. However, de...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3151 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5109/viewcontent/SSRN_id3498616.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5109 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-51092022-08-15T06:24:16Z The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law KHOO, Kenneth SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe It is well understood that the exchange of information between horizontal competitors can violate competition law provisions in both the European Union (EU) and the United States, namely, article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and section 1 of the Sherman Act. However, despite ostensible similarities between EU and U.S. antitrust law concerning interfirm information exchange, substantial differences remain. In this article, we make a normative argument for the U.S. antitrust regime's approach, on the basis that the United States’ approach to information exchange is likely to be more efficient than the relevant approach under the EU competition regime. Using economic theories of harm concerning information exchange to understand the imposition of liability in relation to “stand‐alone” instances of information exchange, we argue that such liability must be grounded on the conception of a prophylactic rule. We characterize this rule as a form of ex ante regulation and explain why it has no ex post counterpart in antitrust law. In contrast to the U.S. antitrust regime, we argue that the implementation of such a rule pursuant to EU competition law leads to higher error costs without a significant reduction in regulatory costs. As a majority of jurisdictions have competition law regimes that resemble EU competition law more closely than U.S. antitrust law, our thesis has important implications for competition regimes around the world. 2020-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3151 info:doi/10.1111/ablj.12155 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5109/viewcontent/SSRN_id3498616.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Antitrust Law Comparative Law Law and Economics Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law and Economics |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Antitrust Law Comparative Law Law and Economics Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law and Economics |
spellingShingle |
Antitrust Law Comparative Law Law and Economics Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law and Economics KHOO, Kenneth SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law |
description |
It is well understood that the exchange of information between horizontal competitors can violate competition law provisions in both the European Union (EU) and the United States, namely, article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and section 1 of the Sherman Act. However, despite ostensible similarities between EU and U.S. antitrust law concerning interfirm information exchange, substantial differences remain. In this article, we make a normative argument for the U.S. antitrust regime's approach, on the basis that the United States’ approach to information exchange is likely to be more efficient than the relevant approach under the EU competition regime. Using economic theories of harm concerning information exchange to understand the imposition of liability in relation to “stand‐alone” instances of information exchange, we argue that such liability must be grounded on the conception of a prophylactic rule. We characterize this rule as a form of ex ante regulation and explain why it has no ex post counterpart in antitrust law. In contrast to the U.S. antitrust regime, we argue that the implementation of such a rule pursuant to EU competition law leads to higher error costs without a significant reduction in regulatory costs. As a majority of jurisdictions have competition law regimes that resemble EU competition law more closely than U.S. antitrust law, our thesis has important implications for competition regimes around the world. |
format |
text |
author |
KHOO, Kenneth SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe |
author_facet |
KHOO, Kenneth SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe |
author_sort |
KHOO, Kenneth |
title |
The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law |
title_short |
The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law |
title_full |
The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law |
title_fullStr |
The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law |
title_full_unstemmed |
The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law |
title_sort |
inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: regulating information exchange in eu and u.s. antitrust law |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3151 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5109/viewcontent/SSRN_id3498616.pdf |
_version_ |
1772829494682320896 |