The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law

It is well understood that the exchange of information between horizontal competitors can violate competition law provisions in both the European Union (EU) and the United States, namely, article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and section 1 of the Sherman Act. However, de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KHOO, Kenneth, SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3151
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5109/viewcontent/SSRN_id3498616.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5109
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-51092022-08-15T06:24:16Z The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law KHOO, Kenneth SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe It is well understood that the exchange of information between horizontal competitors can violate competition law provisions in both the European Union (EU) and the United States, namely, article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and section 1 of the Sherman Act. However, despite ostensible similarities between EU and U.S. antitrust law concerning interfirm information exchange, substantial differences remain. In this article, we make a normative argument for the U.S. antitrust regime's approach, on the basis that the United States’ approach to information exchange is likely to be more efficient than the relevant approach under the EU competition regime. Using economic theories of harm concerning information exchange to understand the imposition of liability in relation to “stand‐alone” instances of information exchange, we argue that such liability must be grounded on the conception of a prophylactic rule. We characterize this rule as a form of ex ante regulation and explain why it has no ex post counterpart in antitrust law. In contrast to the U.S. antitrust regime, we argue that the implementation of such a rule pursuant to EU competition law leads to higher error costs without a significant reduction in regulatory costs. As a majority of jurisdictions have competition law regimes that resemble EU competition law more closely than U.S. antitrust law, our thesis has important implications for competition regimes around the world. 2020-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3151 info:doi/10.1111/ablj.12155 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5109/viewcontent/SSRN_id3498616.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Antitrust Law Comparative Law Law and Economics Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law and Economics
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Antitrust Law
Comparative Law
Law and Economics
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Law and Economics
spellingShingle Antitrust Law
Comparative Law
Law and Economics
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Law and Economics
KHOO, Kenneth
SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe
The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law
description It is well understood that the exchange of information between horizontal competitors can violate competition law provisions in both the European Union (EU) and the United States, namely, article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and section 1 of the Sherman Act. However, despite ostensible similarities between EU and U.S. antitrust law concerning interfirm information exchange, substantial differences remain. In this article, we make a normative argument for the U.S. antitrust regime's approach, on the basis that the United States’ approach to information exchange is likely to be more efficient than the relevant approach under the EU competition regime. Using economic theories of harm concerning information exchange to understand the imposition of liability in relation to “stand‐alone” instances of information exchange, we argue that such liability must be grounded on the conception of a prophylactic rule. We characterize this rule as a form of ex ante regulation and explain why it has no ex post counterpart in antitrust law. In contrast to the U.S. antitrust regime, we argue that the implementation of such a rule pursuant to EU competition law leads to higher error costs without a significant reduction in regulatory costs. As a majority of jurisdictions have competition law regimes that resemble EU competition law more closely than U.S. antitrust law, our thesis has important implications for competition regimes around the world.
format text
author KHOO, Kenneth
SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe
author_facet KHOO, Kenneth
SOH, Jerrold Tsin Howe
author_sort KHOO, Kenneth
title The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law
title_short The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law
title_full The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law
title_fullStr The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law
title_full_unstemmed The inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: Regulating information exchange in EU and U.S. antitrust law
title_sort inefficiency of quasi-per se rules: regulating information exchange in eu and u.s. antitrust law
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3151
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5109/viewcontent/SSRN_id3498616.pdf
_version_ 1772829494682320896