The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement
This article examines the key societal developments underpinning the growth of mediation in Singapore with the view to analysing the evolving conceptualisation of justice within mediation. The introduction of mediation corresponded with a shift from adversarial justice to an indigenous form of conci...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3157 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5115/viewcontent/Quek_Anderson___A2J_and_ADR_Accepted_Manuscript__1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5115 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-51152022-01-21T07:37:19Z The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON, This article examines the key societal developments underpinning the growth of mediation in Singapore with the view to analysing the evolving conceptualisation of justice within mediation. The introduction of mediation corresponded with a shift from adversarial justice to an indigenous form of conciliatory justice, in which a respected mediator played an advisor role to the disputants and was trusted to ensure the fairness of the process. However, this trajectory was tempered by the need to ensure that Singapore mediation practice conformed with international practices concerning the protection of parties’ autonomy. The ambivalence concerning the mediator’s role has resulted in uncertainty about whether the mediator bears primary responsibility for ensuring procedural and substantive fairness. The article discusses the implications of this ambiguity and proposes ways to resolve it. The current phase of professionalisation in Singapore’s mediation movement offers the opportune moment to resolve these existing tensions and to crystallise the mediator’s role in facilitating access to justice. 2020-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3157 info:doi/10.1017/S1744552320000105 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5115/viewcontent/Quek_Anderson___A2J_and_ADR_Accepted_Manuscript__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University access to justice mediation autochthonous conciliatory justice Singapore mediation movement Asian Studies Dispute Resolution and Arbitration |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
access to justice mediation autochthonous conciliatory justice Singapore mediation movement Asian Studies Dispute Resolution and Arbitration |
spellingShingle |
access to justice mediation autochthonous conciliatory justice Singapore mediation movement Asian Studies Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON, The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement |
description |
This article examines the key societal developments underpinning the growth of mediation in Singapore with the view to analysing the evolving conceptualisation of justice within mediation. The introduction of mediation corresponded with a shift from adversarial justice to an indigenous form of conciliatory justice, in which a respected mediator played an advisor role to the disputants and was trusted to ensure the fairness of the process. However, this trajectory was tempered by the need to ensure that Singapore mediation practice conformed with international practices concerning the protection of parties’ autonomy. The ambivalence concerning the mediator’s role has resulted in uncertainty about whether the mediator bears primary responsibility for ensuring procedural and substantive fairness. The article discusses the implications of this ambiguity and proposes ways to resolve it. The current phase of professionalisation in Singapore’s mediation movement offers the opportune moment to resolve these existing tensions and to crystallise the mediator’s role in facilitating access to justice. |
format |
text |
author |
Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON, |
author_facet |
Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON, |
author_sort |
Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON, |
title |
The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement |
title_short |
The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement |
title_full |
The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement |
title_fullStr |
The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement |
title_full_unstemmed |
The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement |
title_sort |
evolving concept of access to justice in singapore’s mediation movement |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3157 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5115/viewcontent/Quek_Anderson___A2J_and_ADR_Accepted_Manuscript__1_.pdf |
_version_ |
1772829586178965504 |