The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement

This article examines the key societal developments underpinning the growth of mediation in Singapore with the view to analysing the evolving conceptualisation of justice within mediation. The introduction of mediation corresponded with a shift from adversarial justice to an indigenous form of conci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3157
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5115/viewcontent/Quek_Anderson___A2J_and_ADR_Accepted_Manuscript__1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5115
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-51152022-01-21T07:37:19Z The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON, This article examines the key societal developments underpinning the growth of mediation in Singapore with the view to analysing the evolving conceptualisation of justice within mediation. The introduction of mediation corresponded with a shift from adversarial justice to an indigenous form of conciliatory justice, in which a respected mediator played an advisor role to the disputants and was trusted to ensure the fairness of the process. However, this trajectory was tempered by the need to ensure that Singapore mediation practice conformed with international practices concerning the protection of parties’ autonomy. The ambivalence concerning the mediator’s role has resulted in uncertainty about whether the mediator bears primary responsibility for ensuring procedural and substantive fairness. The article discusses the implications of this ambiguity and proposes ways to resolve it. The current phase of professionalisation in Singapore’s mediation movement offers the opportune moment to resolve these existing tensions and to crystallise the mediator’s role in facilitating access to justice. 2020-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3157 info:doi/10.1017/S1744552320000105 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5115/viewcontent/Quek_Anderson___A2J_and_ADR_Accepted_Manuscript__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University access to justice mediation autochthonous conciliatory justice Singapore mediation movement Asian Studies Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic access to justice
mediation
autochthonous
conciliatory justice
Singapore mediation movement
Asian Studies
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
spellingShingle access to justice
mediation
autochthonous
conciliatory justice
Singapore mediation movement
Asian Studies
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON,
The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement
description This article examines the key societal developments underpinning the growth of mediation in Singapore with the view to analysing the evolving conceptualisation of justice within mediation. The introduction of mediation corresponded with a shift from adversarial justice to an indigenous form of conciliatory justice, in which a respected mediator played an advisor role to the disputants and was trusted to ensure the fairness of the process. However, this trajectory was tempered by the need to ensure that Singapore mediation practice conformed with international practices concerning the protection of parties’ autonomy. The ambivalence concerning the mediator’s role has resulted in uncertainty about whether the mediator bears primary responsibility for ensuring procedural and substantive fairness. The article discusses the implications of this ambiguity and proposes ways to resolve it. The current phase of professionalisation in Singapore’s mediation movement offers the opportune moment to resolve these existing tensions and to crystallise the mediator’s role in facilitating access to justice.
format text
author Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON,
author_facet Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON,
author_sort Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON,
title The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement
title_short The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement
title_full The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement
title_fullStr The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement
title_full_unstemmed The evolving concept of access to justice in Singapore’s mediation movement
title_sort evolving concept of access to justice in singapore’s mediation movement
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3157
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5115/viewcontent/Quek_Anderson___A2J_and_ADR_Accepted_Manuscript__1_.pdf
_version_ 1772829586178965504