Towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of Strata Property

Cake-cutting is a longstanding metaphor for a wide range of real-world problems that involve the division of anything of value. Unsurprisingly, where owners of a strata scheme wish to end the strata scheme and collectively sell their development, one of the most contentious issues may be the apporti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TI, Edward S. W.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3202
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5160/viewcontent/UNSWLJ_ET.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5160
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-51602021-01-12T03:26:28Z Towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of Strata Property TI, Edward S. W. Cake-cutting is a longstanding metaphor for a wide range of real-world problems that involve the division of anything of value. Unsurprisingly, where owners of a strata scheme wish to end the strata scheme and collectively sell their development, one of the most contentious issues may be the apportionment of sale proceeds. In Singapore, this problem is compounded in mixed developments which have both commercial and residential elements as well as in developments with different sized units, often with disproportionate strata share values; even differing facings and the state of one’s unit may attract disenchantment when trying to apportion proceeds. This article critically analyses how New South Wales (NSW) and Singapore allocate proceeds pursuant to a collective sale of strata property. In this respect, the Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 (NSW) and Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) are significantly clearer than Singapore’s Land Titles (Strata) Act (Cap 158) as the latter does not prescribe any statutory formula for apportionment. In examining the jurisprudence and respective strata frameworks, this article proposes how proceeds in a collective sale could be more fairly apportioned. 2020-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3202 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5160/viewcontent/UNSWLJ_ET.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Property rights strata title land use planning justice Property Law and Real Estate
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Property rights
strata title
land use planning
justice
Property Law and Real Estate
spellingShingle Property rights
strata title
land use planning
justice
Property Law and Real Estate
TI, Edward S. W.
Towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of Strata Property
description Cake-cutting is a longstanding metaphor for a wide range of real-world problems that involve the division of anything of value. Unsurprisingly, where owners of a strata scheme wish to end the strata scheme and collectively sell their development, one of the most contentious issues may be the apportionment of sale proceeds. In Singapore, this problem is compounded in mixed developments which have both commercial and residential elements as well as in developments with different sized units, often with disproportionate strata share values; even differing facings and the state of one’s unit may attract disenchantment when trying to apportion proceeds. This article critically analyses how New South Wales (NSW) and Singapore allocate proceeds pursuant to a collective sale of strata property. In this respect, the Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 (NSW) and Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) are significantly clearer than Singapore’s Land Titles (Strata) Act (Cap 158) as the latter does not prescribe any statutory formula for apportionment. In examining the jurisprudence and respective strata frameworks, this article proposes how proceeds in a collective sale could be more fairly apportioned.
format text
author TI, Edward S. W.
author_facet TI, Edward S. W.
author_sort TI, Edward S. W.
title Towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of Strata Property
title_short Towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of Strata Property
title_full Towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of Strata Property
title_fullStr Towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of Strata Property
title_full_unstemmed Towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of Strata Property
title_sort towards fairly apportioning sale proceeds in a collective sale of strata property
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3202
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5160/viewcontent/UNSWLJ_ET.pdf
_version_ 1772829534573297664