Opening the door to fickle-minded guilty pleas? Public Prosecutor v Dinesh s/o Rajantheran
Unlike applications to retract guilty pleas, accused persons are not required to provide valid and sufficient reasons when qualifying their guilty pleas in mitigation. In Criminal Reference No. 5 of 2018, the Court of Appeal held that section 228(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code allows accused pers...
Saved in:
Main Author: | GOH, Teng Jun Gerome |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3270 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5228/viewcontent/2020SingJLegalStud756_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
An appropriate plea bargaining model for Thailand
by: Prawut Thavornsiri, Pol.Col.
Published: (2023) -
Possession and Knowledge in the Misuse of Drugs Act: Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v. Public Prosecutor
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Criminal law in Singapore
by: YEO, Stanley, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Criminal Law in Myanmar
by: CHAN, Wing Cheong, et al.
Published: (2023) -
1972 and Fundamental Changes in the Criminal Law of Ireland
by: FINDLAY, Mark
Published: (1981)