The doctrine of wilful blindness in drug offences: Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor [2019] 2 SLR 254
In Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor [2019] 2 SLR 254, the Court of Appeal clarified the operation of the wilful blindness doctrine in the context of knowing possession for drug offences. In particular, it affirmed wilful blindness as a doctrine of substantive rather than evidential law, whic...
Saved in:
Main Author: | WHANG, Rennie |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3272 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5230/viewcontent/32SAcLJ305_pv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Singapore's New Discretionary Death Penalty for Drug Couriers: Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2014) -
Discretionary Death Penalty for Convicted Drug Couriers in Singapore: Reflections on High Jurisprudence thus far
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2015) -
The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor
by: LEE, Kwang Chian
Published: (2021) -
Introducing a ‘presumption of ADR’ for civil matters in the Subordinate Courts
by: LOW, Joyce, et al.
Published: (2012) -
The Judicial Duty to Give Reasons: Thong Ah Fat v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 65
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2011)