The doctrine of wilful blindness in drug offences: Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor [2019] 2 SLR 254
In Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor [2019] 2 SLR 254, the Court of Appeal clarified the operation of the wilful blindness doctrine in the context of knowing possession for drug offences. In particular, it affirmed wilful blindness as a doctrine of substantive rather than evidential law, whic...
محفوظ في:
المؤلف الرئيسي: | WHANG, Rennie |
---|---|
التنسيق: | text |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3272 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5230/viewcontent/32SAcLJ305_pv.pdf |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Singapore's New Discretionary Death Penalty for Drug Couriers: Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan
منشور في: (2014) -
Discretionary Death Penalty for Convicted Drug Couriers in Singapore: Reflections on High Jurisprudence thus far
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan
منشور في: (2015) -
The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor
بواسطة: LEE, Kwang Chian
منشور في: (2021) -
The Judicial Duty to Give Reasons: Thong Ah Fat v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 65
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan
منشور في: (2011) -
Introducing a ‘presumption of ADR’ for civil matters in the Subordinate Courts
بواسطة: LOW, Joyce, وآخرون
منشور في: (2012)