The doctrine of wilful blindness in drug offences: Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor [2019] 2 SLR 254
In Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor [2019] 2 SLR 254, the Court of Appeal clarified the operation of the wilful blindness doctrine in the context of knowing possession for drug offences. In particular, it affirmed wilful blindness as a doctrine of substantive rather than evidential law, whic...
Saved in:
主要作者: | WHANG, Rennie |
---|---|
格式: | text |
語言: | English |
出版: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
主題: | |
在線閱讀: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3272 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5230/viewcontent/32SAcLJ305_pv.pdf |
標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
機構: | Singapore Management University |
語言: | English |
相似書籍
-
Singapore's New Discretionary Death Penalty for Drug Couriers: Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan
由: CHEN, Siyuan
出版: (2014) -
Discretionary Death Penalty for Convicted Drug Couriers in Singapore: Reflections on High Jurisprudence thus far
由: CHEN, Siyuan
出版: (2015) -
The impossibility defence: Supreme Court case summary: Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor
由: LEE, Kwang Chian
出版: (2021) -
The Judicial Duty to Give Reasons: Thong Ah Fat v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 65
由: CHEN, Siyuan
出版: (2011) -
Introducing a ‘presumption of ADR’ for civil matters in the Subordinate Courts
由: LOW, Joyce, et al.
出版: (2012)