Unjust enrichment and contract
This chapter considers the relationship between unjust enrichment and contract. It critically examines the now discredited ‘implied contract’ theory of restitutionary obligation, by which courts fictionally imputed a contract pursuant to which the defendant agreed to repay the plaintiff. The result...
Saved in:
Main Author: | TANG, Hang Wu |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3402 https://search.library.smu.edu.sg/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma99380333602601&context=L&vid=65SMU_INST:SMU_NUI&lang=en&search_scope=Everything&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Research%20handbook%20on%20unjust%20enrichment%20and%20restitution&offset=0 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Contract, Unjust Enrichment and Leapfrogging
by: SEE, Alvin W. L.
Published: (2012) -
Unjust Enrichment Within a Valid Contract: A Close Look at Roxborough v. Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd
by: TANG, Hang Wu
Published: (2007) -
Unjust enrichment within a valid contract: A close look at Roxborough v. Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd
by: TANG, Hang Wu
Published: (2007) -
Measuring the Unjust Enrichment in a Restitution
by: HUNTER, Howard
Published: (1989) -
An Introduction to the Law of Unjust Enrichment
by: SEE, Alvin W. L.
Published: (2013)